Hi folks,
I'm currently packaging nodejs-7.9 for various deb Distros.
I'll have to maintain some applications that use the fanciest
new features, and precompiled binaries from untrusted sources
(eg. nvm+friends) of course are not an option.
Before I go all of this alone - is there anybody here
Hi all!
Can I build a GUI application on GTK3 and expect it to be independent from
systemd? I've been looking around trying to figure this out but so far I've
found no straight answers. Mabye my looking skills aren't up to par, still
asking beats not knowing any day and this seems like the righ
On Thu, 4 May 2017 10:25:15 +0200, Radagast wrote in message
<20170504102515.40808d6fabf126cb5be01...@openmailbox.org>:
> Hi all!
>
> Can I build a GUI application on GTK3 and expect it to be independent
> from systemd? I've been looking around trying to figure this out but
> so far I've found n
Ok, so vanilla GTK *does* depend on systemd. Well, best start looking for
another toolkit then i guess...
/Radagast
On Thu, 4 May 2017 11:25:28 +0200
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Thu, 4 May 2017 10:25:15 +0200, Radagast wrote in message
> <20170504102515.40808d6fabf126cb5be01...@openmailbox.org>:
On Thu, 04 May 2017, Radagast wrote:
> Ok, so vanilla GTK *does* depend on systemd. Well, best start looking for
> another toolkit then i guess...
GNOME != GTK3. Gtk3 does depend on dbus & co., but does not depend on
systemd. It would be very wrong to do so actually, since a lot of
applications
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 11:43:33AM +0200, Radagast wrote:
> Ok, so vanilla GTK *does* depend on systemd. Well, best start looking for
> another toolkit then i guess...
>
...or perhaps help maintaining and developing GTK2, which does not
depend on systemd. Hard times ahead, but nobody has ever ma
On Thu, 04 May 2017, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 11:43:33AM +0200, Radagast wrote:
> > Ok, so vanilla GTK *does* depend on systemd. Well, best start looking for
> > another toolkit then i guess...
> >
>
> ...or perhaps help maintaining and developing GTK2, which does not
> depend o
I'm having trouble adjusting the backlight on my LCD screen in RC 1 with
XFCE4. No matter what I've tried so far, it stays where it is. With
Ubuntu 16.04, things are pre-configured and it is just a matter of
pressing the right function buttons. However, with Devuan Jessie RC 1
the right commands
Hi parazyd,
On 05/04/2017 01:15 PM, parazyd wrote:
Ok, so vanilla GTK*does* depend on systemd. Well, best start looking for
another toolkit then i guess...
GNOME != GTK3. Gtk3 does depend on dbus & co., but does not depend on
systemd. It would be very wrong to do so actually, since a lot of
On 04.05.2017 09:26, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> At the moment, in debian, /usr/lib/nodejs is there to store all node
> modules installed from debian packages.
hmm, would that conflict w/ having certain "nodejs-$version" subdirs
w/ the actual engines (the whole tree - not splitted out the several
FHS par
On Thu, 04 May 2017, aitor_czr wrote:
>Hi parazyd,
>On 05/04/2017 01:15 PM, parazyd [1] wrote:
>
> Ok, so vanilla GTK *does* depend on systemd. Well, best start looking for
> anothe
> r toolkit then i guess...
>
> GNOME != GTK3. Gtk3 does depend on dbus & co., but does not depend on
> s
On 04.05.2017 11:43, Radagast wrote:
> Ok, so vanilla GTK *does* depend on systemd. Well, best start looking for
> another toolkit then i guess...
I've started hacking up my own widget toolkit. Yet in a pretty early
stage - for now just using it for some small DRM/KMS-based apps.
https://github.
On 04.05.2017 11:51, parazyd wrote:
> GNOME != GTK3. Gtk3 does depend on dbus & co.,
Which already is bad enough. Actually, desktop-bus coming from these
folks - which makes it even funnier that more and more embedded folks
are using it (and then whining about resource consumption and bad
perfor
On 04.05.2017 11:56, KatolaZ wrote:
> Remember that GNOME itself was born as a tentative countermeasure to KDE,
> which was using the (then non-free) QT libraries, hence forcing users
> to abide to a non-free license from Trolltech...
... and because of the resource consumption, excessive build t
On 04.05.2017 15:12, aitor_czr wrote:
> Gtk3 doesn't depend on dbus, whereas some apps like slim, synaptic,
> thunar, seahorse, nautilus... But not Gtk per se, neither the Qt toolkit.
Qt does - at least much parts of it. You can opt-out at build time,
but then you'll looser other features.
BTW:
On 04.05.2017 15:58, parazyd wrote:
> Nope, Gtk3 does depend on dbus. More correctly, its accessibility parts
> depend on dbus.
What exactly does that 'accessibility' stuff actually do ?
--mtx
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailingli
On 04.05.2017 14:42, Lars Noodén wrote:
> $ ls /sys/class/backlight/
>
No backlight devices ?
Smells like a problem w/ either kernel (drivers missing ?) or
ACPI configuration (on x86).
--mtx
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglist
On Thu, 04 May 2017, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> On 04.05.2017 15:58, parazyd wrote:
>
> > Nope, Gtk3 does depend on dbus. More correctly, its accessibility parts
> > depend on dbus.
>
> What exactly does that 'accessibility' stuff actually do ?
It's somewhat a black box. Nobody e
Now that you mention it, I recall I read somewhere that GTK2 is still receiving
secrity updates. So, that might be an option...
Radgast
On Thu, 4 May 2017 10:56:58 +0100
KatolaZ wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 11:43:33AM +0200, Radagast wrote:
> > Ok, so vanilla GTK *does* depend on systemd.
Am 2017-05-04 17:22, schrieb Radagast:
Now that you mention it, I recall I read somewhere that GTK2 is still
receiving secrity updates. So, that might be an option...
I would also vote for gtk2. gtk3 ist strictly bound to Gnome 3 and
changes every few days, breaking current themes.
Jochen
__
Well, that would be a brainpain to maintain... Where might I find the GTK2
bugtracker? bugzilla.gnome.org seemed void of GTK2 stuff.
/Radagast
On Thu, 04 May 2017 19:01:47 +0200
Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> Am 2017-05-04 17:22, schrieb Radagast:
> > Now that you mention it, I recall I read somewhe
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 04:15:15PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wrote:
> What exactly does that 'accessibility' stuff actually do ?
It does for people with various disabilities what a screen, keyboard
and mouse do for people without disabilities.
Greg
--
web site: http://www.gregn.
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 03:42:54PM +0300, Lars Noodén wrote:
> I've also tried adding "acpi_backlight=vendor" to the kernel boot options.
Try:
acpi-backlight=vendor
instead of
acpi_backlight=vendor
If that still doesn't work, then try:
acpi-backlight=vendor acpi_osi=Linux
Greg
--
web site: ht
Don't know what's happening here. First, I love Devuan. It's quick and
efficient.
I use Thunderbird for my mail and calendar needs. I went to
schedule an appointment with my doctor, and was surprised to find,
for the first time, the time display in 24-hour format. Never
happens wi
Dear Init Freedom Lovers,
Once again the Veteran Unix Admins salute you!
Just two weeks after the release of Devuan Jessie 1.0.0 RC, we are
happy to announce Devuan Jessie 1.0.0 RC2. Thanks to the very good
feedback received from the community, this release candidate is one
step closer to our fi
25 matches
Mail list logo
