I just want to clarify which are the best repos to use to build an live and
or installable image from?
I've done a number of build recently using these repos. But this is
currently broken. I've tried other combinations of repos, but they had
missing packages.
_MIRROR_BINARY="http://pkgmaster.devu
Rick Moen wrote on 16/07/18 07:44:
Quoting Hendrik Boom (hend...@topoi.pooq.com):
But I wold like to be able to run wheezy very occasionally -- there's an
application I have that suffered the end-of-days in wheezy -- so I'd
like to find another solution.
http://www.enterprisenetworkingplane
Quoting Hendrik Boom (hend...@topoi.pooq.com):
> But I wold like to be able to run wheezy very occasionally -- there's an
> application I have that suffered the end-of-days in wheezy -- so I'd
> like to find another solution.
http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netos/article.php/3586546/N
On Sunday 15 July 2018 at 22:03:23, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I got all local services, includig wifi, to work.
>
> The last holdout seems to have been /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider
>
> It would have been fouond with one more *: /etc/*/*/*
> If this message gets out, it worked.
Well done :)
Antony.
Hendrik Boom wrote on 15.07.2018 22:03:
[...]
> And I found a number of other eth's in /etc/* and /etc/*/* using grep.
[...]
> It would have been fouond with one more *: /etc/*/*/*
Hi Hendrik,
you may find that using grep's -r or -R option can make your life a
lot easier. Quoting the man page:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 09:31:25PM +0200, Stefan Krusche wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 15. Juli 2018 schrieb Hendrik Boom:
> > But there is a /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
> > so I'll try editing that.
>
> That is the one, or at least one you can use. Just change the interface names
> with key
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 09:31:25PM +0200, Stefan Krusche wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 15. Juli 2018 schrieb Hendrik Boom:
> > But there is a /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
> > so I'll try editing that.
>
> That is the one, or at least one you can use. Just change the interface names
> with key
Am Sonntag, 15. Juli 2018 schrieb Hendrik Boom:
> But there is a /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
> so I'll try editing that.
That is the one, or at least one you can use. Just change the interface names
with keyword NAME="net0" (for example) to your liking and paired with your
desired
On 2018-07-15 13:37, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 02:27:26PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:41:21PM +0200, Udo Hennig wrote:
> I get some trouble with the network after updating to ascii and
> rebooting too on two computers. I found some messages in dmesg li
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 02:27:26PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:41:21PM +0200, Udo Hennig wrote:
> > I get some trouble with the network after updating to ascii and
> > rebooting too on two computers. I found some messages in dmesg like
> >
> > Cannot rename eth0 to eth1
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:41:21PM +0200, Udo Hennig wrote:
> I get some trouble with the network after updating to ascii and
> rebooting too on two computers. I found some messages in dmesg like
>
> Cannot rename eth0 to eth1, name already in use
> Cannot rename eth2 to eth0, name already in use
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 07:03:13PM +0200, Stefan Krusche wrote:
> Am Samstag, 14. Juli 2018 schrieb Hendrik Boom:
> > (2) How should I go about tracking down the problem?
> >
> > I might add that ifconfig reports the usual interfaces of eth0, eth1,
>
> Have you checked they also have the same MAC
I get some trouble with the network after updating to ascii and
rebooting too on two computers. I found some messages in dmesg like
Cannot rename eth0 to eth1, name already in use
Cannot rename eth2 to eth0, name already in use
It looks like udev change the name of the devices. I solved this edit
Ralph Ronnquist wrote:
>> Since the HTTPS certification principle is based on domain names, it's hard
>> to understand in general how routers would be able to hold such certificates
>> (installed by vendors), and if they could, what value that would have in
>> terms of security.
They don't, and it
14 matches
Mail list logo
