On 07/11/2018 22:17, Rick Moen wrote:
It appears that you can change that behaviour (not tested by me) by
enabling user_allow_other in /etc/fuse.conf.
Yes I can confirm this works :)
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.o
Quoting J. Fahrner (j...@fahrner.name):
> Am 2018-11-07 22:17, schrieb Rick Moen:
> >You seem to be missing the point. The prohibition of access by any
> >user (even root) other than the owning user is imposed by the kernel
> >FUSE layer that GVFS uses, not by GVFS. The point is that all FUSE
>
Am 2018-11-07 22:17, schrieb Rick Moen:
You seem to be missing the point. The prohibition of access by any
user
(even root) other than the owning user is imposed by the kernel FUSE
layer that GVFS uses, not by GVFS. The point is that all FUSE
filesystems (e.g., sshfs) would do the same.
I do
Hi,
..enjoy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0K6WupUMb-E
..disclaimer: These 2 lawyers discuss the fundamental cause of such
tech etc flaws: Human / C-level greed, corporate policy, flawed laws
and ditto enforcement.
No "tech" symptom band aids here.
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Re
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 08:55:55 +0100
Andreas Messer wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 12:11:44AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > It's a _touchscreen_ phone, not a "real" computer. For that you
> > want Gemini or GPD Pocket. The input device is not fit for any
> > real hacking. You at most connect
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 12:15:35AM +0100, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 October 2018 at 23:59:33, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
>
> > What do they mean by sloppy?
>
> https://backports.debian.org/Instructions/#index4h2
So the sloppy distributions are not not required to be cleanly upgraded?
--
Quoting J. Fahrner (j...@fahrner.name):
> Am 2018-11-07 21:12, schrieb Rick Moen:
> >Isn't this an eyebrow-raising FUSE developer policy, rather than an
> >eyebrow-raising GNOME developer policy?
>
> GVFS stands for GNOME Virtual File System
I'm completely aware of what GVFS stands for.
You s
Am 2018-11-07 21:12, schrieb Rick Moen:
Isn't this an eyebrow-raising FUSE developer policy, rather than an
eyebrow-raising GNOME developer policy?
GVFS stands for GNOME Virtual File System
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists
Quoting J. Fahrner (j...@fahrner.name):
> This is why I hate Gnome!
> I'm wondering how they made something that root cannot access. This
> is not Unix!
Isn't this an eyebrow-raising FUSE developer policy, rather than an
eyebrow-raising GNOME developer policy?
--
Cheers,
This is why I hate Gnome!
I'm wondering how they made something that root cannot access. This is
not Unix!
Originalnachricht
Betreff: [Bug 225361] Re: .gvfs can't be stat'd by root causing backup
tools to fail
Datum: 2018-11-07 20:31
Von: Bug Watch Updater <225...@bugs.launc
Quoting KatolaZ (kato...@freaknet.org):
> named-checkconf is only half the story. The other half is
> named-checkzone :P
IMO, the most useful to say about named-checkzone is that it's
redundant to 'named-checkconf -z'. So there, I've covered it. ;->
_
Quoting KatolaZ (kato...@freaknet.org):
> named-checkconf is only half the story. The other half is
> named-checkzone :P
Oh, and also: If your zonefiles have $INCLUDE directives and BIND9 is
running in a chroot, then named-checkzone will break as it will not
understand the referenced file's pat
I would also like to see sloppy added as the latest ZFS packages are there.
Chris
On October 31, 2018 2:01:35 AM MDT, Joril wrote:
>Hi everyone!
>
>I've just become aware of the existence of jessie-backports-sloppy :D
>It
>looks like this distribution is not available on Devuan's reposito
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 10:25:21PM -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting terryc (ter...@woa.com.au):
>
> > 1. What do people recommend as online sources for Bind configuration
> > these days.
>
> Online book _DNS for Rocket Scientists_,
> http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/.
>
> > 2. what programs do y
14 matches
Mail list logo
