Le 12/06/2019 à 19:12, s@po a écrit :
First of all, I think that this subject derailed to a diferent subject.
I Apologise for give my opinion on a concrete subject, because, I never felt it would
turn out "to be almost personal.."
Never saw anything personal here and the discussion
On 2019-05-28 15:53, Rick Moen wrote:
[1] Last I heard, Microsoft OSes had nothing quite like a symlink,
which was
one reason why Cygwin was a bit of a kludge. (They may have fixed
that;
I wouldn't know
...
Yes, they are possible.
Notes:
https://blog.spiralofhope.com/?p=13539
Tested in
On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 08:40 -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> More precisely, sizeof(foo) is the spacing of consecutive elements of
> type foo.
Most importantly for most people, malloc(sizeof(foo)*n) must not cause
unexpected things like a kaboom.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Hello guys,
First of all, I think that this subject derailed to a diferent subject.
I Apologise for give my opinion on a concrete subject, because, I never felt it
would turn out "to be almost personal.."
My Opinion is based on the Idea that we should not create extra complications,
When we are
Le 12/06/2019 à 16:29, Irrwahn a écrit :
More precisely, sizeof(foo) is the spacing of consecutive elements of type foo.
-- hendrik
Thank you Hendrik, that is indeed very aptly phrased!
Just for the sake of completeness, the actual language definition
takes the usual wordy but precise
Hendrik Boom wrote on 12.06.19 14:40:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:47:42PM +0200, Irrwahn wrote:
>
>>
>> There is nothing wrong here. Gcc reports the size that is necessary to
>> store an object of type sesqui_int, including any padding that has been
>> applied, e.g. for alignment reasons. An
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:47:42PM +0200, Irrwahn wrote:
>
> There is nothing wrong here. Gcc reports the size that is necessary to
> store an object of type sesqui_int, including any padding that has been
> applied, e.g. for alignment reasons. An array of n elements of that type
> will in
Didier Kryn wrote on 12.06.19 12:15:
[...]
Hi Didier,
please allow me to clear up some apparent misconceptions below.
>
> What I meant in this discussion is that sizeof() allows to
> calculate the number of elements of an array, because we make
> assumptions on data layout, but this is
...on Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:17:44PM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
> You *could* make a tarball and copy that to NTFS. Imperfect but no semantic
> loss that way
Last I checked, --no-xattrs --no-acls --no-selinux still was the
default for GNU tar.
So if you want to keep any of those, you
Hi Didier,
En 12 de junio de 2019 7:40:08 Didier Kryn escribió:
sizeof() is not a real function. Its syntax makes it look like a
function but it is not. Its argument can be either a variable or a type
(which no function can have). It is evaluated at compile time - which is
equivalent to
10 matches
Mail list logo
