Re: [DNG] :-) Don't get into a pissing contest with Rick Moen

On Wed, 25 Dec 2019 15:27:00 +1100 Andrew McGlashan via Dng wrote: > Hi, > > On 19/12/19 10:27 pm, Steve Litt wrote: > > My advice, don't get into a pissing contest with Rick Moen: You'll > > lose. I know, I've lost many times. Rick and I are actually good > > friends, but when we disagree, we g

[DNG] Can we fix this DMARC thing?

Seriously, this DMARC thing, or at least the way it's implemented on DNG, is downright dangerous. I accidentally replied onlist to yet another, as I was researching this. Did you know that for some but not all DNG email, "reply to sender" sends it to the list? That's just plain dangerous and shoul

[DNG] Again, again: DMARC is a no-win problem for mailing lists (was: Can we fix this DMARC thing?)

Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com): > Seriously, this DMARC thing, or at least the way it's implemented on > DNG, is downright dangerous. Seriously, at the time this came up, I worked really hard, tirelessly, and thanklessly, and repeatedly, to explain that Dng was caught in a dilemm

Re: [DNG] Can we fix this DMARC thing?

On 2019-12-26 20:30, Steve Litt wrote: Seriously, this DMARC thing, or at least the way it's implemented on DNG, is downright dangerous. I accidentally replied onlist to yet another, as I was researching this. Here is one bit of advice that I use (at least metaphorically) almost every day: