On 2020-05-26 17:51, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Did it exist prior to the creation of Systemd?
I think it depends on how you count. There was a predecessor project
called dmd which was created to be PID 1 on Hurd. If you count dmd then
it precedes systemd, otherwise not.
--
Ian
__
Thanks to some helpful off-list replies and to additional research,
for a casual reader:
This access control is implemented via udev and elogind which *is* systemd code
and architecture.
This is supposed to "just work", for some definition of "work".
When it does not, you face a challenge (a syst
Le 26/05/2020 à 10:26, Steve Litt a écrit :
> On Mon, 25 May 2020 10:08:17 -0700
> Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> On 2020-05-21 14:09, Steve Litt wrote:
>>
>>> * Busybox init
>>> * Epoch
>>> * OpenRC
>>> * Runit
>>> * s6 (plus s6-rc)
>>> * Suckess init plus [daemontools | runit | s6]
>>> * systemd
>>>
On 2020-05-26 03:26, Steve Litt wrote:
On Mon, 25 May 2020 10:08:17 -0700
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On 2020-05-21 14:09, Steve Litt wrote:
> * Busybox init
> * Epoch
> * OpenRC
> * Runit
> * s6 (plus s6-rc)
> * Suckess init plus [daemontools | runit | s6]
> * systemd
> * sysvinit
* GNU Shepherd ?
On Mon, 25 May 2020 10:08:17 -0700
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2020-05-21 14:09, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > * Busybox init
> > * Epoch
> > * OpenRC
> > * Runit
> > * s6 (plus s6-rc)
> > * Suckess init plus [daemontools | runit | s6]
> > * systemd
> > * sysvinit
>
> * GNU Shepherd ?
>
> https://ww
> From: Dng [mailto:dng-boun...@lists.dyne.org] On Behalf Of terryc
> Sent: den 26 maj 2020 03:23
> My understanding is that it is a inherent limitation of *nix.
Fortunately, for the purposes of installations here, we see
some acceptable solutions, my hope was though that Devuan
already implement
