[DNG] (Almost) no sound under Beowulf

2020-09-25 Thread Marc Shapiro via Dng
I have been running Debian for over 20 years, but I want to avoid systemd, so I am trying out Devuan. I installed ASCII a last year and just did an upgrade to Beowulf about a week ago.  My goal now is to get Beowulf to run close enough to my Debian Stretch system that my wife and daughter

Re: [DNG] ..devuan to the rescue? Easiest possible newbie email server setup, ideas?

2020-09-25 Thread Mark Rousell
On 25/09/2020 18:21, DECbot wrote: > > I had to double check my config. I never got around to forward > outgoing mail through my ssh tunnel. I'm still using the postfix > relayhost parameter to granting me my ISP's blessing to smtp out to > the rest of the world--and likely giving them a copy of

Re: [DNG] Xorg stopped working after upgrade to Beowulf

2020-09-25 Thread spiralofhope
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:30:53 +0200 viverna wrote: > or xinit with custom command line, for example: > xinit /home/user/.xinitrc -- /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc :0 vt2 -keeptty I had some entertainment dealing with this problem over the years. When I switched to Devuan I had to tinker a bit. I

Re: [DNG] ..devuan to the rescue? Easiest possible newbie email server setup, ideas?

2020-09-25 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2020-09-24 12:07, Rick Moen wrote: > I've had no problems _without_ DMARC/DKIM (but with a strongly > asserted SPF record). Have been operating home *ix SMTP smarthosts on > static IP with matching rDNS, and maintaining a clean, high-reputation > system since the 1980s. > > I've tried to

Re: [DNG] ..devuan to the rescue? Easiest possible newbie email server setup, ideas?

2020-09-25 Thread DECbot
On September 24, 2020 5:52:20 AM Mark Rousell wrote: On 23/09/2020 02:32, DECbot wrote: Since my ISP is the devil and blocks port 25, I'm using autossh to forward port 25 traffic to a $5/month vps. Do you have difficulty with your outgoing SMTP being blocked (often silently swallowed, from

Re: [DNG] ..devuan to the rescue? Easiest possible newbie email server setup, ideas?

2020-09-25 Thread Mark Rousell
On 24/09/2020 20:07, Rick Moen wrote: > > DMARC can be made to be a non-issue. ;-> > > :r! dig -t txt _dmarc.linuxmafia.com +short > "DMARC: tragically misdesigned since 2012. Check our SPF RR, instead." > Basically, in my experience, some operators may be assigning a _very small_ > spamicity

Re: [DNG] removing systemd from rpm-based distro

2020-09-25 Thread Peter Duffy
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 13:31 +0200, Tito via Dng wrote: > > Il 25/09/20 13:03, Peter Duffy ha scritto: > > Apologies - this is probably off-topic, or at least veering off in that > > direction. Also apologies if this has been addressed previously and I've > > missed it - if so, I'd appreciate it

Re: [DNG] removing systemd from rpm-based distro

2020-09-25 Thread Tito via Dng
Il 25/09/20 13:03, Peter Duffy ha scritto: > Apologies - this is probably off-topic, or at least veering off in that > direction. Also apologies if this has been addressed previously and I've > missed it - if so, I'd appreciate it if someone would point me at the > discussion. > > Given the

[DNG] removing systemd from rpm-based distro

2020-09-25 Thread Peter Duffy
Apologies - this is probably off-topic, or at least veering off in that direction. Also apologies if this has been addressed previously and I've missed it - if so, I'd appreciate it if someone would point me at the discussion. Given the successful removal of systemd from debian, and the