On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:32:51 +0200
tito via Dng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> v 1.8
>
> now with supported DE's:
>
> 1) GNOME
> 2) LXDE
> 3) LXQT
> 4) XFCE
> 5) KDE
> 6) MATE
> 7) CINNAMON
>
> and minor fixes, improvements and cleanups.
>
> Made script more robust against failures:
> 1) added test for
Hi,
v 1.8
now with supported DE's:
1) GNOME
2) LXDE
3) LXQT
4) XFCE
5) KDE
6) MATE
7) CINNAMON
and minor fixes, improvements and cleanups.
Made script more robust against failures:
1) added test for internet connectivity
2) check that time and date is correct
or apt update will fail.
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:06:02 +0200
Antoine via Dng wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 April at 16:13, tito via Dng wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >thanks for your time and effort. My question was rather practical,
> >so let me rephrase it: is there a robust way to detect from a script
> >if buster non-free and
On Wednesday, 14 April at 16:13, tito via Dng wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your time and effort. My question was rather practical,
so let me rephrase it: is there a robust way to detect from a script
if buster non-free and contrib repos are enabled in
/etc/apt/sources.lists so that I can add the same
Le 15/04/2021 à 16:01, Hendrik Boom a écrit :
>> Yes, but the end result of enforcing free software purism is a lot of
>> those so exposed give up and install Windows. I don't blame them. A few
>> times I've found it *really* hard to install when the installer just
>> says "you might need nonfree
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:16:08PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> aitor said on Wed, 14 Apr 2021 22:28:59 +0200
>
> >Hi Steve,
> >
> >On 14/4/21 15:02, Steve Litt wrote:
> >> I think free software purist snobs drive more people back to
> >> Windows than cleanse people of their non-free ways.
> >The
On 3/9/21 9:22 AM, David Kuehling via Dng wrote:
> I think we were bitten by this known Debian Bug:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925309
>
> "Wrong prefix directory hardcoded in signed GRUB image"
>
> Signed grub assumes that the initial grub.cfg is in
