Re: [DNG] meta: list

2022-08-31 Thread onefang
On 2022-08-31 11:04:51, Curtis Maurand wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 31, 2022, at 10:39 AM, marc wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > Just a quick note that in the last week or so google seems > > have ratcheted up its rejection of mail from independent MTAs > > a notch or two. > > > >

Re: [DNG] meta: list

2022-08-31 Thread Gregory Nowak via Dng
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:14:31AM +0200, marc wrote: > Hi > > Just a quick note that in the last week or so google seems > have ratcheted up its rejection of mail from independent MTAs > a notch or two. > > IF you check your logs, you might see 550 rejects with a message > such as > > Our sys

Re: [DNG] meta: list

2022-08-31 Thread Mike Schmitz via Dng
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:14:31AM +0200, marc wrote: > Hi > > Just a quick note that in the last week or so google seems > have ratcheted up its rejection of mail from independent MTAs > a notch or two. > > IF you check your logs, you might see 550 rejects with a message > such as > > Our sys

Re: [DNG] meta: list

2022-08-31 Thread Curtis Maurand
Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 31, 2022, at 10:39 AM, marc wrote: > > Hi > > Just a quick note that in the last week or so google seems > have ratcheted up its rejection of mail from independent MTAs > a notch or two. > > IF you check your logs, you might see 550 rejects with a message > such

Re: [DNG] meta: list

2022-08-31 Thread declassed art via Dng
I do have an unconfigured PTR for a couple of reasons, one of those is lack of static IP for now. But I never had problems with gmail. Instead, I have problems with this list which rejects my messages sent from my own MTA because they cannot find a hostname for my IP. So I have to post from my gmai

[DNG] meta: list

2022-08-31 Thread marc
Hi Just a quick note that in the last week or so google seems have ratcheted up its rejection of mail from independent MTAs a notch or two. IF you check your logs, you might see 550 rejects with a message such as Our system has detected that this message is likely unsolicited mail. To reduce