on from
their old default install.
Simon
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Mitt Green wrote:
> I reckon as long as his Fedora boots, he doesn't care.
I think that's the key reason.
Linus is concerned with the kernel - and while I suspect he has personal
preferences about what is run on top of that, he's "detached" enough to take
the
Didier Kryn wrote:
>Down to zero?
Depends on what the system is doing !
I've just checked several of my systems, one showed 12k when I logged in and
dropped to 0. OK, that's a router so doesn't do much disk I/O - just a bit of
logging.
Another (my mail server amongst other
Didier Kryn wrote:
>That's the logic one would naively expect but I'm not sure of it. I'm
> afraid the data remains in the cache and not backed-up to disk until some
> process needs room in the cache. You can do the experiment of writing data to
> a usb memory stick and
Didier Kryn wrote:
> There remains a fundamental problem with automatic mount/umount. While
> automounting is safe, auto-unmounting is not if it is triggered by device
> removal.
> Unmounting must be done *before* removing the device if anything has been
> written to it,
Steve Litt wrote:
> I did a test. I created hello.txt, put "hello world" in it, saved it,
> and yanked out the thumb three seconds later. Of course the
> whole /media/sdd1 tree vanished. When I plugged in the thumb again,
> hello.txt contained exactly what I'd typed in
Steve Litt wrote:
> With /dev/sd? you can at least try to guess which one got
> plugged in last, and then verify.
It's certainly no warse (probably better actually) than the Windows world where
it could be E:, F:, or something else - and it could even change
, suggests,
recommends, version ...), showpkg (which is a summary), search,
check outman apt-cache
Simon
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
On 24/12/15 10:36, Emiliano Marini wrote:
Yeah, I checked that manpage, but apt-cache shows no info about recommended
and suggested packages, only dependencies (at least in wheezy)
apt-cache show package
gives info, including recommended.
Simon
documentation seems lacking, but example files are a great fallback as long as
programs use plain-text ones.
Simon
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Linux O'Beardly wrote:
> While many here would probably say it's not a good idea to run servers on
> Devuan until a production release, I am already running it on a number of
> servers.
That's good to know - I need to find time to do some testing myself.
> R. W.
John Hughes wrote:
> Yes, the impression I get around here is that this is a religious argument
> for most of you.
>
> I had hopes for Devuan, but the lack of rational thinking convinces me that
> it's going nowhere.
There's no lack of rational thinking.
People here don't
Dragan FOSS wrote:
> If the group is so weak, that one opponent may threaten it, then something is
> wrong with that group, right?
No.
As pointed out, the "discussion" has distracted people from the task in hand.
No-one here has to justify their desire to be systemd free
Mitt Green wrote:
> Go Linux wrote:
>
>> Just a heads up. None of your emails are coming through. Not even in spam.
>> I >only know that you've posted when I see quotes in the responses. I have
>> a >yahoo address for this list and it has been a
Florian Zieboll wrote:
> You know, I am certainly not the person who wouldn't agree to the
> concept of breaking eggs to make an omelette. But it's completely
> unnacceptable to go to the supermarket and break everybody else's eggs
> too, just because you want to make yourself
Edward Bartolo wrote:
>> No matter what you believe about this, overriding a command with itself
>> is a pointless exercise. dh_auto_clean will be invoked as part of the
>> 'dh clean' sequence, cf
>
> Please, refrain from using offensive and vulgar expressions. 'cf' is
>
Florian Zieboll wrote:
> If the fear of loosing your mail archive is the only reason to avoid
> IMAP: Many IMAP capable mail clients support synchronizing to local
> folders. For those that don't, you can easily create a local (or remote)
> backup with isync/mbsync which could
Steve Litt wrote:
> You might wonder why I'm so partial to IMAP: A fair question indeed.
I think a fairer question would be why anyone would be against it !
OK, there's one reason - and that's if you are not running you own mail server
in which case you are reliant
shraptor wrote:
> I must admit I am really clueless to what is considered good practice in
> mailing-lists.
...
> I am not rude on purpose but I truly don't know mailing-list style of
> interaction.
> Should I delete this or keep this? Write here or write there?
In "days
Gregory Nowak wrote:
> From what I read, the 2nd generation B has one 10/100 ethernet port
> which is a network card on one of the pi's usb ports. Besides that, it
> does have four usb ports, and you can hook up hubs to those as well of
> course.
That is correct - one 10/100
Mitt Green wrote:
> I mean, that's something normal, neither years in the field
> nor degree won't make you smart and experienced
> (years are not equal to experience) alone, something
> has to be inside your skull.
That echoes something I wrote off-list to the OP.
Having
Jaromil wrote:
> Of the three perhaps only Linus did, after
> all he is an active programmer and reads
> regularly code. But he is refraining from
> doing universal statements pro or against
> the whole of systemd, while interacting
> on details, which I think is wise to do for
Mitt Green wrote:
> But I also have libsystemd0 file in /etc/apt/preferences.d containing:
>
>
>
> Package: libsystemd0
> Pin: origin ""
> Pin-Priority: -1
>
>
Does anyone have any tips for getting more meaningful output from
Didier Kryn wrote:
> NTP does not adjust the RTC brutally; it seems to adjust slowly the frequency
> so that synchronization happens without the process being noticeable to other
> apps - it can take hours. On shutdown it saves the RTC settings in
> /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift, and
Didier Kryn wrote:
>>> Why the hell did they invent suspend-to-disk?
>> I take it you don't like the idea ?
> No. I don't dislike the idea. I admit it is brillant.
I'm confused then - but that's not hard !
> This leads to the conclusion: boot time doesn't matter if you never
Didier Kryn wrote:
> Why the hell did they invent suspend-to-disk?
I take it you don't like the idea ?
My only laptop is OS X, and I tend to leave so much open (text files of
temporary notes, a gazzillion web pages/tabs, mail (home), mail (work), and a
few others. To boot
KatolaZ wrote:
> ... but please: do not urge people
> to reboot, ever. There is simply no need at all to reboot, and in the
> ovewhelming majority of use cases it is not necessary at all to use
> the latest kernel available, unless ...
With all due respect, I disagree with
Godefridus Daalmans wrote:
> We all need to begin somewhere.
>
> Not all of us are experienced enough in the areas we need to learn to make
> Devuan thrive.
Indeed, and I feel a bit "leechish" not being able to put anything practical in
- I know next to nothing about
Didier Kryn wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why are the virtual Ethernet given random addresses?
Well they have to have something !
For Xen, they've registered an OUI to get a block of MAC addresses to use. If
you don't specify teh MAC address in the VM config then it'll pick one at
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Can we agree that ww shouldnn't have to change our configurations if we
> do not change anything in the hardware?
That would be a reasonable base requirement.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
poitr pogo wrote:
> > I thought it was stupid for other reasons, but now that you mention it,
>
> > yeah, naming it after the particular slot into which it's plugged in is
> > stupid, and if you take the box apart and move things around, you can
> > break your OS.
> >
>
>
tilt! wrote:
> I think the entire issue "how do i scan for available networks" is badly
> implemented in wicd *and* in Windows WiFi Connections (which are two WiFi
> connection assistants i know from practice).
For completeness, this is how OS X (version 10.8) does it.
If
Steve Litt wrote:
>> The whole point of having 'an operating system'
>> is that it provides an abstract interface userspace software can use
>> to interact with the physical components of a different computer
>> according to the functions they're supposed to be
Timo Buhrmester wrote:
> Probably because people don't want this behavior. Auto-respawn only
> makes sense when you're "relying" on buggy software you already expect
> to blow up, *and* are unwilling to debug it. "Try turning it off
> and on again", "A restart will fix it"
Laurent Bercot <ska-de...@skarnet.org> wrote:
> On 25/09/2015 09:05, Simon Hobson wrote:
>> More to the point, I'd rather have reliability over speed any day.
>
> How about you get both?
Well yes, that's better still.
> The dichotomy is a false one. People beli
KatolaZ wrote:
> Just please try to
> avoid falling in the same "everybody needs to boot-up in 12 seconds
> because high availability requires so" rhetoric championed by
> systemd-fanboys.
More to the point, I'd rather have reliability over speed any day. If the
system
KatolaZ wrote:
> Agree! That's why I would warmly suggest mobile devices producers to
> include a pluggable nixie-tubes display like this:
>
> http://ad7zj.net/kd7lmo/images/ground_nixie_front.jpg
Metaphorical "hands up" - how many of us went "gosh, how long is it since I
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> ... or the fact that apache on the box I'm presently
> using 'depends' on bind and syslog.
Well in the general case*, those are not unreasonable dependencies. In the
general case*, Apache needs** DNS resolution during startup, and it
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> That's a long rant about 'systemd architecture' with an inflammatory
> subject someone posted to the systemd devel list. It didn't receive any
> replies more noteworthy than the original text which is 'hardly
> surprising'.
Ah, I'm not
Nate Bargmann n...@n0nb.us wrote:
I'll add my voice to the chorus objecting to the idea that removal of
systemd is for servers only.
I don't think anyone has suggested it's for servers only.
But, there is an argument for picking the low hanging fruit - and that means
trying to do the easy
Mitt mitt_gr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I noticed that my messages are not pointed to those who they are sent to. See
image
https://imgur.com/J4UaT7D
Are you referring to the fact that it's not shown in it's place in the tree
like the rest of the messages ?
If so, then that's because your mails
Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote:
See above, the DNG mailing list is mostly full of discussions and not
much actions, except for from a few people.
That is the impression I'd got as well.
Now I'll preface the next bit with ... this is not meant to be an insult or
criticism, so
Haines Brown hai...@histomat.net wrote:
Just a side note. I installed Sid on a x250 Thinkpad and then replaced
systemd with sysVinit. Things seem to be working just fine, although
admittedly I didn't install any desktop environment.
Did you also try removing the rest of SystemD ?
Haines Brown hai...@histomat.net wrote:
No. I installed sysvinit-core sysvinit sysvinit-utils, rebooted, and
then did:
# apt-get remove --purge --auto-remove systemd
# echo -e '\n\nPackage: *systemd*\nPin: origin \nPin-Priority: \
-1' /etc/apt/preferences.d/systemd
So you
Stephanie Daugherty sdaughe...@gmail.com wrote:
They did, but out of all this design by committee, hidden between all the
political bullshit and bikeshedding, they also created the most brilliant,
most comprehensive set of standards for quality control, package uniformity,
license
T.J. Duchene t.j.duch...@gmail.com wrote:
I used Debian Sid recently, with the apparent ability to boot
using either System 5 or Systemd via Grub. The choice seems clear to me
that Devuan could minimize upsteam maintenance by looking at that.
The problem is not which init system to use -
Rainer Weikusat rainerweiku...@virginmedia.com wrote:
ClamAV claims to support FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Solaris, OpenVMS,
Slackware and Windows, all of which certainly don't have systemd. I've
just cloned the current development repository and build it on Wheezy
using a plain
./configure
It seems to me that it's good to have shim programs that satisfy
dependencies of apps on systemd, each shim performing some systemd
function. Here's why:
Suppose there are 10,000 application programs (apps) for Linux,
and their developers foolishly insert dependencies on systemd.
If
601 - 648 of 648 matches
Mail list logo