Quoting vnsnda...@memeware.net (vnsnda...@memeware.net):
> Version 2 of the GPL forbids
Bye, MikeeUSA!
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Version 2 of the GPL forbids the incorporation of additional
restrictive terms, relating to the distribution, modification, etc of
the article licensed under the terms.
Those that violate this section are declared, by operation of the
terms, to have their grant automatically revoked.
An addition
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 03:28:18PM +, vsnsdua...@memeware.net wrote:
>
> Additionally the CoC regime itself is a license terms violation, being an
> additional restrictive term, as explained in the other analysis. (Similar to
> the GRSecurity license violation)
Actually, no. It has no effect
It has been 2 months. Eben Moglen has published no research.
Because there is nothing more to say: The GPLv2, as used by linux, is a
bare license. It can be rescinded at the will of the grantor.
The regime that the FSF used, vis-a-vis the GPLv2, is essential:
copyright transfers to a central
