On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:08:59AM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:15:33AM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:32:36PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> > > Dear list,
> > >
> > > For years I'd used a couple of rsync scripts for backup,
> > > usually just full sn
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:15:33AM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:32:36PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > For years I'd used a couple of rsync scripts for backup,
> > usually just full snapshots.
> >
> > I knew there is an option using hardlinks that behave
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:32:36PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> For years I'd used a couple of rsync scripts for backup,
> usually just full snapshots.
>
> I knew there is an option using hardlinks that behaves like
> the Mac Time Machine app, giving cheap incremental backups.
>
> ht
il devuanizzato Joel Roth il 03-02-18 04:32:36 ha scritto:
> Dear list,
>
> For years I'd used a couple of rsync scripts for backup,
> usually just full snapshots.
>
> I knew there is an option using hardlinks that behaves like
> the Mac Time Machine app, giving cheap incremental backups.
You ma
On 02.02.18 17:32, Joel Roth wrote:
> Probably you all have something much better, but for the
> sake of discussion, and will post my humble offering.
Not better, but a data point for anyone else backing up to a flash drive,
which is convenient for the off-site backup. Rsync compares checksums
b
Dear list,
For years I'd used a couple of rsync scripts for backup,
usually just full snapshots.
I knew there is an option using hardlinks that behaves like
the Mac Time Machine app, giving cheap incremental backups.
https://blog.interlinked.org/tutorials/rsync_time_machine.html
And now I fool
