Hi,
Hendrik Boom writes:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 06:43:09PM -0500, o1bigtenor via Dng wrote:
>> Greetings
>>
>> Firefox is quite ticking me off.
>> It has this penchant for NOT remembering the previous session even
>> when the click box has been 'enabled'.
>
> Firefox aways remebers my last se
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 06:43:09PM -0500, o1bigtenor via Dng wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Firefox is quite ticking me off.
> It has this penchant for NOT remembering the previous session even
> when the click box has been 'enabled'.
Firefox aways remebers my last session.
I'm using firefox-est in chima
On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 18:43:09 -0500
o1bigtenor via Dng wrote:
> Someone who is using chromium - - - - is it possible to harden
> chromium?
The Brave browser specifically targets de-Googling and removing
shenanigans.
https://brave.com/
https://brave.com/linux/
It also has native ad blocking that
Have you tried to start off with a new FF profile? Just for a test, open FF
from console with:
firefox-esr --profile-manager
...then create a new profile and try: It will restore your open windows when
chosen to do so with the new profile.
Regards, Adrian.
In der Nachricht vom Friday
Greetings
Firefox is quite ticking me off.
It has this penchant for NOT remembering the previous session even
when the click box has been 'enabled'.
I am quite uncomfortable with ms googly's desire to know everything
about me but maybe I would use chromium IF I can stop the trackers. In
FF I use
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:46:22PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
[cut]
>
> I wonder if Devuan had the foresight in config.h to set
>
> static Bool enableplugins = FALSE;
>
> Straight from Suckless, it's set to TRUE. If the Devuan developers set
> it to FALSE, that has the same effect as al
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:13:31 +
KatolaZ wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 06:24:36PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:39:56 +
> > KatolaZ wrote:
> > What I've found is that if you want to do this in stable manner (at
> > least on Void), you need the following command, E
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 06:24:36PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:39:56 +
> KatolaZ wrote:
>
>
> > If you don't mind minimal stuff (i.e., a browser that just browse the
> > WWW and downloads files on request), then surf+tabbed is a very good
> > and stable solution. Here a
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:39:56 +
KatolaZ wrote:
> If you don't mind minimal stuff (i.e., a browser that just browse the
> WWW and downloads files on request), then surf+tabbed is a very good
> and stable solution. Here are the links:
>
> http://surf.suckless.org/
> http://tools.suckless.o
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:45:26PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 20:31:08 -0500, Steve wrote in message
> <20170225203108.2838a...@mydesk.domain.cxm>:
>
> > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:34:50 -0500
> > Hendrik Boom wrote:
> >
> > > And speaking of bookmarks, each browser seems to j
Quoting Arnt Karlsen (a...@iaksess.no):
> ..make it GPLv2, v3 is too kind on violators. ;o)
Steve leans strongly towards permissive licensing, of the MIT-ish
flavour.
Copyright violation is actually possible under permissive licences, too:
The obvious way is to wrongfully remove another contri
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 20:31:08 -0500, Steve wrote in message
<20170225203108.2838a...@mydesk.domain.cxm>:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:34:50 -0500
> Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> > And speaking of bookmarks, each browser seems to jealously hang on
> > to its bookmarks, unless perhaps another browser manage
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 04:00:23PM +0100, J. Fahrner wrote:
> Am 23.02.2017 um 20:39 schrieb KatolaZ:
> >
> > "tabbed surf -g -e"
> >
> > and you are done. Well, you still need a good "man tabbed" and "man
> > surf" to get things done...
>
> What is the option "-g" for? Mine seems to not have it.
Am 23.02.2017 um 20:39 schrieb KatolaZ:
>
> "tabbed surf -g -e"
>
> and you are done. Well, you still need a good "man tabbed" and "man
> surf" to get things done...
What is the option "-g" for? Mine seems to not have it.
According to the man page, plugins should be supported by copying them
to /u
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 20:08:44 -0500
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Now to figure out how to bind keytrokes or menu entries. I currently
> use xcfe, completely in dfault configuration. After coming as
> refugee from gnome and kde, I hesitate to cuddle up with a new DE and
> invest real effort into it.
>
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:34:50 -0500
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> And speaking of bookmarks, each browser seems to jealously hang on to
> its bookmarks, unless perhaps another browser manages to sneak in
> like a thief and import them. Is this the way browsers cement their
> grip on users? Isn't there
I've just tested this on debian sid and I can add the shortcut and it
works. I have many shortcuts that I use, and don't have any problems.
Ozi
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 2:53 AM, wrote:
> On 2017-02-25 06:04, fsmithred wrote:
>
>> On 02/25/2017 05:50 AM, Jaromil wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017,
On 2017-02-25 06:04, fsmithred wrote:
On 02/25/2017 05:50 AM, Jaromil wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, aitor_czr wrote:
In my case (refracta xfce), there is no entry field for the
keyboard
shortcut, only for the command, as you can see in the following
screenshot:
[2]http://gnuinos.org
On 02/25/2017 05:50 AM, Jaromil wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, aitor_czr wrote:
>>In my case (refracta xfce), there is no entry field for the keyboard
>>shortcut, only for the command, as you can see in the following
>>screenshot:
>>
>>[2]http://gnuinos.org/hotkeys.png
>
> yes, but
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Jaromil wrote:
> I wonder is there a better graphical tool to configure hotkeys
> actually? I understand that must be integrated with the
> windowmanager... or is there something independent of it?
answering myself after a bit of research it seems that there is an
old-sch
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, aitor_czr wrote:
>In my case (refracta xfce), there is no entry field for the keyboard
>shortcut, only for the command, as you can see in the following
>screenshot:
>
>[2]http://gnuinos.org/hotkeys.png
yes, but there is a way to leave focus from input and bang
Hi Jaromil,
El 24/02/17 a las 12:31, Jaromil escribió:
about hotkeys in xfce, I had odd experienced both in Refracta and in
Devuan, that newly created hotkeys aren't responding. Does anyone has
the same experience?
In my case (refracta xfce), there is no entry field for the keyboard
shortcut
Quoting Hendrik Boom (hend...@topoi.pooq.com):
> Are there other Devuan-packaged lightweight browsers anyone might
> recommend? I may switch to chromium, but I doubt that it's
> lightweight.
Not exactly the answer to your question, but to a similar one: I
maintain what I hop is a list of all
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:21:13AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 07:39:56PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 01:34:50PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > > Are there other Devuan-packaged lightweight browsers anyone might
> > > recommend? I may switch to chro
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 07:39:56PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 01:34:50PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > Are there other Devuan-packaged lightweight browsers anyone might
> > recommend? I may switch to chromium, but I doubt that it's
> > lightweight.
>
> If you don't mind mi
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Is this a kind of refugee syndrome? never feeling I'm home any
> more?
if you are into such a syndrome, then get prepared to cry for days
whenever you will finally feel at home again.
about hotkeys in xfce, I had odd experienced both in Refracta and in
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 07:39:56PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
>
> I have already implicitly replied to this question before you even
> answered it (in the gtk+3 thread).
>
> If you don't mind minimal stuff (i.e., a browser that just browse the
> WWW and downloads files on request), then surf+tabbed is
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:47:33PM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:34:50 -0500
> Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> > But firefox sometimes get crazy slow -- so slow I get no feedbak
> > whether I've properly clicked on a menu item or icon or some
> > such. I've recently discoveree
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 01:34:50PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Browsers. What a mess.
>
[cut]
>
> Are there other Devuan-packaged lightweight browsers anyone might
> recommend? I may switch to chromium, but I doubt that it's
> lightweight.
>
I have already implicitly replied to this ques
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:34:50 -0500
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> But firefox sometimes get crazy slow -- so slow I get no feedbak
> whether I've properly clicked on a menu item or icon or some
> such. I've recently discovereed that killall firfox-esr will kill it,
> and when I restart it offers to re
Browsers. What a mess.
I've beed using Devuan since alpha-2.
I had to stop using chrome when support wsa suddenly dropped for my
platform -- 32-bit linux. This after I had increased my RAM from one
to two gigibytes and recovered decent performance.
I switched to firefox. FOr a while there w
31 matches
Mail list logo
