Re: [DNG] Chris Lamb = Good Maintainer (Was: Debian testing drop redis)

2017-10-28 Thread Jaromil
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017, John Hughes wrote: > While keeping your eyes peeled is obviously a good thing please > remember the downsides of crying wolf when the wolf isn't there. crying wolf?! we are the wolves!!! while since the move to systemd Debian is just an elephant walking on stills. ciao _

Re: [DNG] Chris Lamb = Good Maintainer (Was: Debian testing drop redis)

2017-10-28 Thread John Hughes
On 27/10/17 21:56, Jaromil wrote: my training in hermeneutics and epistemology rings a bell about this being the wrong general attitude about changes and regressions, but for now I just rest on the fact redis "just works" in Devuan ASCII (using sysvinit) and that, as I stated at the beginning,

Re: [DNG] Chris Lamb = Good Maintainer (Was: Debian testing drop redis)

2017-10-27 Thread Jaromil
thanks Patrick, your reports have been most precious to this thread IMHO On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Patrick Meade wrote: > On 10/26/2017 09:36 AM, John Hughes wrote: > > Frankly it seems that some people have been rather fast to assume bad > > faith and very few people who commented either knew what

Re: [DNG] Chris Lamb = Good Maintainer (Was: Debian testing drop redis)

2017-10-26 Thread Chris Lamb
Patrick, > I opened a pull request with Chris Lamb to discuss reverting his changes > to the sysvinit scripts in redis-server and redis-sentinel. ^^^ I'm not sure how many times I can repeat myself on this point but this was not a sysvinit-specific change. As you can clearl

Re: [DNG] Chris Lamb = Good Maintainer (Was: Debian testing drop redis)

2017-10-26 Thread Patrick Meade
On 10/26/2017 09:36 AM, John Hughes wrote: Frankly it seems that some people have been rather fast to assume bad faith and very few people who commented either knew what they were talking about or made the slightest effort to actually understand what Chris Lamb had done. I opened a pull reque