On 22/12/17 12:31, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 21/12/17 05:13, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Steve Litt writes:
Is there evidence somewhere that Debian DDs use OS/x?
It's so common among developers in general that it would be very
surprising if zero debianites do it.
Macbooks are almost a standard
On 21/12/17 05:13, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Steve Litt writes:
Is there evidence somewhere that Debian DDs use OS/x?
It's so common among developers in general that it would be very
surprising if zero debianites do it.
Macbooks are almost a standard among developers, certainly a majority of
Steve Litt wrote on 12/21/2017 07:42 PM:
> And I can go in and change almost anything I
> want about this machine.
I've used a macbook, iMac and Mac Mini over the course of 10 years but could
never quite acclimate to the environment. I always felt like I was driving a
borrowed car.
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 12:23:17 +0100
Didier Kryn wrote:
> I also feel pretty good being a member of a minority, the
> minority of the Linux desktop users. I feel uncomfortable on Windows
> and Mac, and like to tweak my desktop.
I'm a Linux desktop user too, although my Daily
Hello
> A quick search found
> https://www.geekwire.com/2016/mac-overtakes-linux-as-developers-primary-os-windows-headed-below-50-market-share/
If one takes that statement at face value, then unless HP, Dell,
Lenovo, Acer, Sony, etc, etc. change their strategy they are
each doomed to make up a
Am 21. Dezember 2017 19:08:18 MEZ schrieb goli...@dyne.org:
> but wasn't there an issue with not being able
> to unlock the screen after suspend requiring
> a reboot?
I remember two similar situations: In one case some screensaver / -blanking was
active and hitting the keyboard helped; in
On 2017-12-21 05:06, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
I'll find out, and perhaps suggest some change to a package. KDE as
built doesn't offer "suspend" as a possible reaction to closing the
lid, the /etc/acpi/events directory is empty, and the lid close event
doesn't lead to anything in syslog. But I'll
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:23:17PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Concerning the most popular languages, I feel out of the game: the only
> one of the list I read and write is C, which is badly ranked.
And this reveals what type of developers that site is talking about: those
are folks who crank
Le 21/12/2017 à 11:30, Arnt Gulbrandsen a écrit :
A quick search found
https://www.geekwire.com/2016/mac-overtakes-linux-as-developers-primary-os-windows-headed-below-50-market-share/
Concerning the most popular languages, I feel out of the game: the
only one of the list I read and
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:06:55AM +, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> kato...@freaknet.org writes:
> >So, if everybody switch to macbooks, we don't need to struggle any
> >more to make things work on Linux, right?
>
> That's right. But irrelevant since not everyone will switch to macbooks.
>
>
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:30:40AM +, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> kato...@freaknet.org writes:
> >Yes, I see. It's not that macbooks are preferred by developers. It's
> >more like they are forced onto them by the marketing departments of
> >their companies, who must ensure that their employees'
kato...@freaknet.org writes:
Yes, I see. It's not that macbooks are preferred by developers. It's
more like they are forced onto them by the marketing departments of
their companies, who must ensure that their employees' laptops shine
at least as much as their competitors'.and then we gasp
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 09:24:51AM +, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> kato...@freaknet.org writes:
> >I don't see how macbooks could be the "standard" among developers
> >(BTW, what kind of developers?). I cannot associate any feeling except
> >*claustrophobia* to the very few times when I had to
kato...@freaknet.org writes:
I don't see how macbooks could be the "standard" among developers
(BTW, what kind of developers?). I cannot associate any feeling except
*claustrophobia* to the very few times when I had to use a Mac. But
perhaps I don't qualify as the kind of developer to whom Mac
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 09:13:15PM +, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> Steve Litt writes:
> >Is there evidence somewhere that Debian DDs use OS/x?
>
> It's so common among developers in general that it would be very surprising
> if zero debianites do it.
>
> Macbooks are almost a standard among
Steve Litt writes:
Is there evidence somewhere that Debian DDs use OS/x?
It's so common among developers in general that it would be very surprising
if zero debianites do it.
Macbooks are almost a standard among developers, certainly a majority of
the last hundred developers I've worked
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:52:10 +0100
Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 20/12/2017 à 00:45, Nate Bargmann a écrit :
> > Perhaps not DDs explicitly, but there are videos out there at
> > *Linux* conferences where some developer opens their Mac laptop and
> > proceeds to switch to the VM
Le 20/12/2017 à 00:45, Nate Bargmann a écrit :
* On 2017 19 Dec 16:12 -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
For people working on server or web crap, that's reasonable (besides the
unreasonability of using OS X in general): a good part of server Debian
users connect from Windows or Fruits, developers
* On 2017 19 Dec 16:12 -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
> For people working on server or web crap, that's reasonable (besides the
> unreasonability of using OS X in general): a good part of server Debian
> users connect from Windows or Fruits, developers doing so wouldn't make me
> bat an eye. Note
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:11:24PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:17:00PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > > Is there evidence somewhere that Debian DDs use OS/x?
> >
> > I have no evidence, but it's not implausible if developing
> > Debian is their job.
>
> For people
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:17:00PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:00:50PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:23:31 +0100
> > Jaromil wrote:
> >
> > > This is OT, but AFAIK many Debian developers simply use OSX,
> >
> > Jaromil, how can
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:00:50PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:23:31 +0100
> Jaromil wrote:
>
> > yes, this is no true as you say. Devuan is a universal
> > distribution. Also we may consider ourselves to be all 'participants'
> > in it, rather than
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:23:31 +0100
Jaromil wrote:
> yes, this is no true as you say. Devuan is a universal
> distribution. Also we may consider ourselves to be all 'participants'
> in it, rather than differentiate between 'users' and 'developers',
> since many of those of use
23 matches
Mail list logo