On 2020-06-11 11:46, Simon Hobson wrote:
> > > What's left in Debian are bits that are actually used by some
> > > programs.
> >
> > Such as the LSB headers in init scripts?
> >
> > Some SysV init maintainers have very strict opinions on those
> > headers, considered a language for the insserv "
Alessandro Vesely via Dng wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Standard_Base#Limitations_on_Debian
Ah, that helps. I was confusing LSB with FSH and LSB headers - not that I ever
followed such detail closely.
>> What's left in Debian are bits that are actually used by some programs.
>
On 07/06/2020 00:33, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:04:33PM +0100, Simon Hobson wrote:
>> While upgrading a system to Beowulf, I noticed this in the changelogs.
>> Is this one of those "it was fizzling out anyway so no big deal" things, or
>> another policy change by Debian ?
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:04:33PM +0100, Simon Hobson wrote:
> While upgrading a system to Beowulf, I noticed this in the changelogs.
> Is this one of those "it was fizzling out anyway so no big deal" things, or
> another policy change by Debian ? Not really bothered, just curious.
LSB was a pro
While upgrading a system to Beowulf, I noticed this in the changelogs.
Is this one of those "it was fizzling out anyway so no big deal" things, or
another policy change by Debian ? Not really bothered, just curious.
> lsb (9.20150826) unstable; urgency=low
>
> This update drops all lsb-* compa
