[DNG] Distrowatch

2015-10-31 Thread Don Wright
Didn't see any mention of this little goodie, so enjoy: In DistroWatch Weekly, Issue 632, 19 October 2015, in the News section "Improving package searches", the editors dropped this tidbit: " On a related note, we receive a lot of queries asking if there is a way to find distributions which do

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch

2015-10-31 Thread Go Linux
Would be interesting to see the stats from the searches. This could be added to the list: http://refracta.freeforums.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=529 golinux On Sat, 10/31/15, Don Wright wrote: Subject: [DNG] Distrowatch To: "dng"

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch

2015-11-01 Thread Nuno Magalhães
Unfortunately it only allows you to search by package, leaving you with a lot of non-linux and inactive distros - and no ranking. But it's a nice feature. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch

2015-11-02 Thread Robert Storey
> From: Nuno Magalhães > > Unfortunately it only allows you to search by package, leaving you > with a lot of non-linux and inactive distros - and no ranking. > But it's a nice feature. Yes, but biggest problem is that it misses some good non-systemd distros like Gentoo and Manjaro-OpenRC because

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch

2015-11-02 Thread Steve Litt
On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:57:23 +0800 Robert Storey wrote: > > From: Nuno Magalhães > > > > Unfortunately it only allows you to search by package, leaving you > > with a lot of non-linux and inactive distros - and no ranking. > > But it's a nice feature. > > Yes, but biggest problem is that it miss

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch

2015-11-02 Thread Steve Litt
On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 20:31:27 +0100 Dragan FOSS wrote: > On 11/02/2015 07:00 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > > Here are the distros I've heard of that > > have taken an absolute stand not to*ever* default to systemd: > > If I may remind you ... Devuan did not even exist when TRIOS was > released :) >

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch

2015-11-04 Thread Dragan FOSS
On 11/02/2015 07:00 PM, Steve Litt wrote: Here are the distros I've heard of that have taken an absolute stand not to*ever* default to systemd: If I may remind you ... Devuan did not even exist when TRIOS was released :) Dragan ___ Dng mailing l

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch

2015-11-05 Thread miro . rovis
On 151102-13:00-0500, Steve Litt wrote: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:57:23 +0800 > Robert Storey wrote: > > > > From: Nuno Magalhães > > > > > > Unfortunately it only allows you to search by package, leaving you > > > with a lot of non-linux and inactive distros - and no ranking. > > > But it's a nic

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch

2015-11-05 Thread Nuno Magalhães
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:49 AM, wrote: > > It is very unlikely that Gentoo would switch to systemd. I sure hope so, it and slackware are my current distros of choice ever since Debian ceased to be, it's been fun. However, i must point out that Gentoo does have systemd as an option and this, IMHO

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch

2015-11-05 Thread Steve Litt
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:18:42 + Nuno Magalhães wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:49 AM, wrote: > > > > It is very unlikely that Gentoo would switch to systemd. > > I sure hope so, it and slackware are my current distros of choice ever > since Debian ceased to be, it's been fun. > However, i

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch

2015-11-06 Thread miro . rovis
On 151105-21:19-0500, Steve Litt wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:18:42 + > Nuno Magalhães wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:49 AM, wrote: > > > > > > It is very unlikely that Gentoo would switch to systemd. > > > > I sure hope so, it and slackware are my current distros of choice ever >

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch

2015-11-06 Thread Nuno Magalhães
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:23 AM, wrote: > On 151105-21:19-0500, Steve Litt wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:18:42 + >> Nuno Magalhães wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:49 AM, wrote: >> > > >> > > It is very unlikely that Gentoo would switch to systemd. >> > >> > I sure hope so, it and

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch

2015-11-08 Thread Stefan Mark
On 02.11.2015 14:57, Robert Storey wrote: > Still, it's interesting to hear that so many visitors to DistroWatch are > interested in avoiding systemd. There is definitely an audience there > for Devuan, waiting with bated breath for version 1.0. > I did not wait :P signature.asc Description: Op

[DNG] Distrowatch reviews

2017-03-31 Thread KatolaZ
You might have noticed that distrowatch has recently introduced the possibility to review and rate distros: http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=ranking It is good to see that Devuan is doing quite well overall: http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=ratings&distro=devuan I hop

[DNG] Distrowatch user satisfaction stats

2021-05-21 Thread golinux
I was poking around distrowatch (I don't very often) and found a page which ranks Linux distros according to user ratings. Devuan is #2! Arch is #1 and Debian and the 'buntus (and other "popular distros) are further down the page: https://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=ranking If you're i

[Dng] DistroWatch review of Manjaro-OpenRC

2015-05-31 Thread Robert Storey
Now that Ubuntu and Debian have decided to go over to the Dark Side (ie systemd), I've been looking for a replacement at least until Devuan is released. I believe it was Steve Litt who made a post suggesting that Manjaro-OpenRC was very good, so I checked it out. Long story made short, it is indeed

[DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-18 Thread Go Linux
The Distrowatch poll posted by Jim Murphy a few days ago - https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20160816.141551.cded4448.en.html - went sideways this morning. It was archived with results from another unrelated poll. I emailed to let them know and suddenly the odometer was back to zero and t

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch user satisfaction stats

2021-05-21 Thread Bernard Rosset via Dng
To be honest, I never heard of distrowatch before. There are 221 reviews on Devuan, though. 221! People seem to know the place, and going full steam tu use it to share with the world! We must be doing something right!!  :D Taking Debian, which had solid basis in the past, and fixing the cra

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch user satisfaction stats

2021-05-23 Thread Steve Litt
goli...@devuan.org said on Fri, 21 May 2021 14:29:14 -0500 >I was poking around distrowatch (I don't very often) and found a page >which ranks Linux distros according to user ratings. > >Devuan is #2! Arch is #1 and Debian and the 'buntus (and other >"popular distros) are further down the page: >

Re: [Dng] DistroWatch review of Manjaro-OpenRC

2015-06-01 Thread Steve Litt
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:11:08 +0800 Robert Storey wrote: > Now that Ubuntu and Debian have decided to go over to the Dark Side > (ie systemd), I've been looking for a replacement at least until > Devuan is released. I believe it was Steve Litt who made a post > suggesting that Manjaro-OpenRC was ve

Re: [Dng] DistroWatch review of Manjaro-OpenRC

2015-06-03 Thread Ángel Ramírez Isea
Good review. Testing it tomorrow. El 2015-06-01 00:11, Robert Storey escribió: Now that Ubuntu and Debian have decided to go over to the Dark Side ... Feedback on the story is welcome (even negative feedback). regards, Robert -- Saludos cordiales, Ángel Ramírez Isea. Usuario de Devuan y Can

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-19 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:21:24AM +, Go Linux wrote: > The Distrowatch poll posted by Jim Murphy a few days ago - > https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20160816.141551.cded4448.en.html - went > sideways this morning. It was archived with results from another unrelated > poll. I emailed

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-19 Thread Go Linux
On Fri, 8/19/16, Adam Borowski wrote: Subject: Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over To: dng@lists.dyne.org Date: Friday, August 19, 2016, 2:13 AM On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:21:24AM +, Go Linux wrote: >> The Distrowatch poll posted by Jim Murphy a few days ago - &g

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-19 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:55:49PM +, Go Linux wrote: > On Fri, 8/19/16, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Subject: Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over > To: dng@lists.dyne.org > Date: Friday, August 19, 2016, 2:13 AM > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:21:24AM

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-19 Thread Steve Litt
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:55:49 + (UTC) Go Linux wrote: > On Fri, 8/19/16, Adam Borowski wrote: > > What's the point of a poll that's stuffed with votes from one side? > > > > What's the point of any poll or election? I imagine that would > depend whether you agree with those doing the 's

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-19 Thread Nate Bargmann
I chose the second option as it does need a bit more work WRT Network Manager a few small nits. I'm confident these will be completed soon. - Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more:

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-19 Thread fsmithred
On 08/19/2016 01:31 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:55:49 + (UTC) > Go Linux wrote: > >> On Fri, 8/19/16, Adam Borowski wrote: > >>> What's the point of a poll that's stuffed with votes from one side? >>> >> >> What's the point of any poll or election? I imagine that woul

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-19 Thread Steve Litt
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:06:24 -0400 fsmithred wrote: > For anyone who's interested in the results before they got wiped, I just voted again, "ready to use" again. I'm able to vote multiple times because I'm originally from Chicago. SteveT Steve Litt August 2016 featured book: Manager's Guide t

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-19 Thread Go Linux
On Fri, 8/19/16, fsmithred wrote: Subject: Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over To: dng@lists.dyne.org Date: Friday, August 19, 2016, 1:06 PM On 08/19/2016 01:31 PM, Steve Litt wrote: >> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:55:49 + (UTC) >&

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-19 Thread Edward Bartolo
What does it mean "little" and "lots" of work? Words like "little"and "lots" are too subjective. Although DEVUAN may be a works in progress, many like me have been using it as their production OS for a whole year. An OS can never be ready. Is MS Windows ready? Does it have outstanding bugs? Is ever

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-19 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Adam Borowski (kilob...@angband.pl): > What's the point of a poll that's stuffed with votes from one side? How does that not describe just about every Internet poll, ever? I did, though, rather like what the government of Hungary did about Stephen Colbert fans brigading the Internet poll

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-19 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com): > I just voted again, "ready to use" again. I'm able to vote multiple > times because I'm originally from Chicago. I was able to vote while eating BBQ because I'm visiting Kansas City. ___ Dng mailing lis

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-19 Thread Peter Olson
> On August 19, 2016 at 2:25 PM Steve Litt wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:06:24 -0400 > fsmithred wrote: > > > For anyone who's interested in the results before they got wiped, > > I just voted again, "ready to use" again. I'm able to vote multiple > times because I'm originally from Chicag

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-20 Thread Steve Litt
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:53:18 -0700 Rick Moen wrote: > Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com): > > > I just voted again, "ready to use" again. I'm able to vote multiple > > times because I'm originally from Chicago. > > I was able to vote while eating BBQ because I'm visiting Kansas Ci

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-20 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com): > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:53:18 -0700 > Rick Moen wrote: > > > Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com): > > > > > I just voted again, "ready to use" again. I'm able to vote multiple > > > times because I'm originally from Chicago. > > > >

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-20 Thread Didier Kryn
Le 20/08/2016 07:11, Peter Olson a écrit : On August 19, 2016 at 2:25 PM Steve Litt wrote: On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:06:24 -0400 fsmithred wrote: For anyone who's interested in the results before they got wiped, I just voted again, "ready to use" again. I'm able to vote multiple times because

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-20 Thread Clarke Sideroad
On 08/20/2016 05:02 AM, Didier Kryn wrote: What can prevent a single person from voting multiple times? I have voted - once only - but I think this kind of poll is, at the minimum, terribly biased. It probably only allows one per IP address per day. So if you are on a dynamically assigne

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-22 Thread Go Linux
Looks like the second poll has ended. There's a new one up today and voting is no longer an option. Here are the final results: Poll results for: The state of Devuan I have tried Devuan and it is ready to use: 95 (27%) I have tried Devuan and it needs a little more work:45 (13%) I have

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-22 Thread Steve Litt
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:27:58 + (UTC) Go Linux wrote: > Looks like the second poll has ended. There's a new one up today and > voting is no longer an option. Here are the final results: > > Poll results for: The state of Devuan > > I have tried Devuan and it is ready to use: 95 (27%) > I

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-22 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 06:27:58PM +, Go Linux wrote: > Looks like the second poll has ended. There's a new one up today and voting > is no longer an option. Here are the final results: > > Poll results for: The state of Devuan > > I have tried Devuan and it is ready to use: 95 (27%) > I

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-23 Thread KatolaZ
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 05:28:38PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 06:27:58PM +, Go Linux wrote: > > Looks like the second poll has ended. There's a new one up today and > > voting is no longer an option. Here are the final results: > > > > Poll results for: The state o

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

2016-08-23 Thread Didier Kryn
Le 23/08/2016 09:02, KatolaZ a écrit : I wouldn't be too much concerned about Internet polls. In particular, a scientifically sound poll should ask a single question at a time, and not mix four questions like in this case: - Have you tried Devuan? - If not, do you plan to try it in the future? -