Re: [DNG] Gtk Development

2016-04-25 Thread Simon Walter
On April 26, 2016 2:37:42 AM GMT+09:00, KatolaZ wrote: >On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:36:44PM +0100, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: >> kato...@freaknet.org writes: >> >Seeing that 90% of free software uses autohell I guess it might be >not >> >so ugly :) >> >> That's the Microsoft

Re: [DNG] Gtk Development

2016-04-25 Thread KatolaZ
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:36:44PM +0100, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > kato...@freaknet.org writes: > >Seeing that 90% of free software uses autohell I guess it might be not > >so ugly :) > > That's the Microsoft Windows argument: "Seeing that 90% use windows > it can't be so bad". > My comment

Re: [DNG] Gtk Development

2016-04-25 Thread Arnt Gulbrandsen
kato...@freaknet.org writes: Seeing that 90% of free software uses autohell I guess it might be not so ugly :) That's the Microsoft Windows argument: "Seeing that 90% use windows it can't be so bad". Arnt ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org

Re: [DNG] Gtk Development

2016-04-25 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:17:23AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:59:54AM +0200, aitor_czr wrote: > > > > On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green wrote: > > [cut] > > > >CMake is written in C++, too, and is big and slow. > > >It's even worse than Autohell.

Re: [DNG] Gtk Development

2016-04-25 Thread aitor_czr
On 04/25/2016 12:17 PM, KatolaZ wrote: >On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green wrote: [cut] > >CMake is written in C++, too, and is big and slow. > >It's even worse than Autohell. > > > >Sorry for my allergy to cee plus plus. It spreads > >to HTML ‎emails, too. >

Re: [DNG] Gtk Development

2016-04-25 Thread KatolaZ
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:59:54AM +0200, aitor_czr wrote: > > On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green wrote: [cut] > >CMake is written in C++, too, and is big and slow. > >It's even worse than Autohell. > > > >Sorry for my allergy to cee plus plus. It spreads > >to HTML

Re: [DNG] Gtk Development

2016-04-25 Thread aitor_czr
On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green wrote: Here you are an example about how to build a >gtkmm application using cmake: [...] Hey, Let me put my two cents in. I wouldn't be using both gtkmm and CMake. GTK+ by itself is not very beautiful (glib), GTK+3 just sucks, but

Re: [DNG] Gtk Development

2016-04-24 Thread Mitt Green
‎  aitor_czr wrote: > Here you are an example about how to build a > gtkmm application using cmake: [...] Hey, Let me put my two cents in. I wouldn't be using both gtkmm and CMake. GTK+ by itself is not very beautiful (glib), GTK+3 just sucks, but gtkmm implements this using C++. CMake is

[DNG] Gtk Development

2016-04-24 Thread aitor_czr
Hi all, Here you are an example about how to build a gtkmm application using cmake: www.gnuinos.org/PrintPDF This is the same example as: https://developer.gnome.org/gtkmm-tutorial/3.20/gtkmm-tutorial.html#sec-printing-example including some changes in the code. I'll explain them later. The