Bob Proulx via Dng said on Sun, 28 Nov 2021 10:57:36 -0700
>Mike Tubby wrote:
>> ... but if you run a nameserver you may well need:
>>
>> /var/cache/bind
>>
>> as that's where your zonefiles are ;-)
>
>Sorry. No. I am curious what led you to that conclusion?
>
>By default in the Debian p
Mike Tubby wrote:
> ... but if you run a nameserver you may well need:
>
> /var/cache/bind
>
> as that's where your zonefiles are ;-)
Sorry. No. I am curious what led you to that conclusion?
By default in the Debian packaged configuration only the cached zone
files downloaded on secondari
Or, tell bind to place the zone files where they originally were, in
/etc/bind/zones or something.
The change was made about 10 years ago as a "security feature" and is
mainly used for running bind in a jail, so if it gets hacked, they can't
mess up the rest of the server. I remember when Debian w
Mike Tubby said on Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:07:36 +
>
>... but if you run a nameserver you may well need:
>
> /var/cache/bind
>
>as that's where your zonefiles are ;-)
Thanks for reminding me again one of the reasons I don't use bind. Who
in their right mind would put zone files in a cache di
On 24/11/2021 10:08, Olaf Meeuwissen via Dng wrote:
Hi Hendrik,
Hendrik Boom writes:
I'm setting up a new backup script that will do it all piecemeal so
that if a part of it fails, it can be retried without having to start
*everythng* over from scratch.
Which top-level filesystems should *n
Hi,
Steve Litt writes:
> Dr. Nikolaus Klepp via Dng said on Tue, 23 Nov 2021 20:43:28 +0100
>
>>Anno domini 2021 Tue, 23 Nov 14:27:56 -0500
>> Hendrik Boom scripsit:
>>> I'm setting up a new backup script that will do it all piecemeal so
>>> that if a part of it fails, it can be retried without h
Hi Hendrik,
Hendrik Boom writes:
> I'm setting up a new backup script that will do it all piecemeal so
> that if a part of it fails, it can be retried without having to start
> *everythng* over from scratch.
>
> Which top-level filesystems should *not* be backed up.
>
> To start with, I presumabl
Hi,
Dr. Nikolaus Klepp via Dng writes:
> Anno domini 2021 Tue, 23 Nov 21:39:07 +0200
> Lars Noodén via Dng scripsit:
>> On 11/23/21 21:27, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> > I'm setting up a new backup script that will do it all piecemeal so
>> > that if a part of it fails, it can be retried without havin
Harald Arnesen via Dng said on Tue, 23 Nov 2021 21:56:43 +0100
>Steve Litt [23/11/2021 21.48]:
>
>>
>> The majority of files in /home/yourname are useless. /home/yourname
>> is a mishmash of stuff you created, settings you use, and useless
>> crap
>^^
Steve Litt [23/11/2021 21.48]:
The majority of files in /home/yourname are useless. /home/yourname is
a mishmash of stuff you created, settings you use, and useless crap
like cache. It's huge and ugly. For that reason I create other top
leve
Dr. Nikolaus Klepp via Dng said on Tue, 23 Nov 2021 20:43:28 +0100
>Anno domini 2021 Tue, 23 Nov 14:27:56 -0500
> Hendrik Boom scripsit:
>> I'm setting up a new backup script that will do it all piecemeal so
>> that if a part of it fails, it can be retried without having to
>> start *everythng* o
Anno domini 2021 Tue, 23 Nov 21:39:07 +0200
Lars Noodén via Dng scripsit:
> On 11/23/21 21:27, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > I'm setting up a new backup script that will do it all piecemeal so
> > that if a part of it fails, it can be retried without having to start
> > *everythng* over from scratch.
>
Anno domini 2021 Tue, 23 Nov 14:27:56 -0500
Hendrik Boom scripsit:
> I'm setting up a new backup script that will do it all piecemeal so
> that if a part of it fails, it can be retried without having to start
> *everythng* over from scratch.
>
> Which top-level filesystems should *not* be backe
On 11/23/21 21:27, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I'm setting up a new backup script that will do it all piecemeal so
that if a part of it fails, it can be retried without having to start
*everythng* over from scratch.
[snip]
It depends on what you've set up.
For the systems I have, I only back up the co
I'm setting up a new backup script that will do it all piecemeal so
that if a part of it fails, it can be retried without having to start
*everythng* over from scratch.
Which top-level filesystems should *not* be backed up.
To start with, I presumably shouldn't back up
/proc
/tmp
/dev (cause I
15 matches
Mail list logo
