Le 06/08/2016 22:55, Brian Nash a écrit :
In makefiles, tabs have a special meaning, and it works well.
Sure, but that's not the best of make!
Didier
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
Le 06/08/2016 11:20, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit :
I wouldn't count a language that uses whitepaces as
language constructsanything near 'readable'.
+1
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 01:50:01PM +0100, ael wrote:
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 11:20:30AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wrote:
NAK. I wouldn't count a language that uses whitepaces as
language constructsanything near 'readable'.
FWIW, -1. I have exactly the opposite experience and
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 11:20:30AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wrote:
>
> NAK. I wouldn't count a language that uses whitepaces as
> language constructsanything near 'readable'.
FWIW, -1. I have exactly the opposite experience and thus view.
I don't see the point of dogmatic
On 05.08.2016 15:06, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Python is quite readable without either.
NAK. I wouldn't count a language that uses whitepaces as
language constructsanything near 'readable'.
--mtx
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
On 05.08.2016 10:16, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> There are limits, when the size of the keywords starts to make the
> content harder to find. There's a reason common words in natural
> languages are short. There's no real advantage in having a keyword
> PROCEDURE (yes, all in caps) when PROC would
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:37:42AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 05/08/2016 10:16, Hendrik Boom a écrit :
> > There's no real advantage in having to use
> >BEGIN and END instead of { and }.
> >
> Explanation below, maybe - '{' isn't visible enough, and it's used for
> other unrelated
