Re: [DNG] dbus, Was Re: Systemd-free network-manager package

2015-11-15 Thread Rainer Weikusat
Steve Litt writes: > Rainer Weikusat wrote: >> D-BUS is an OO RPC system intended to enable long-running >> applications to call methods implemented by other long-running >> applications provided these other long-running applications run on the >> same computer. > > Everybody ordering around eve

Re: [DNG] dbus, Was Re: Systemd-free network-manager package

2015-11-15 Thread Rainer Weikusat
Isaac Dunham writes: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 07:36:08PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote: [...] >> OO RPC system intended to enable long-running >> applications to call methods implemented by other long-running >> applications provided these other long-running applications run on the >> same comp

Re: [DNG] dbus, Was Re: Systemd-free network-manager package

2015-11-14 Thread Isaac Dunham
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 07:36:08PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote: > Mitt Green writes: > > Not sure if that was sarcasm though. > > > > Anyway, why do we need dbus if we can live > > without it? > > > > I've seen these [1] cool figures explaining what it is > > but neither them, > > nor the article

Re: [DNG] dbus, Was Re: Systemd-free network-manager package

2015-11-14 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 19:36:08 + Rainer Weikusat wrote: > D-BUS is an OO RPC system intended to enable long-running > applications to call methods implemented by other long-running > applications provided these other long-running applications run on the > same computer. Everybody ordering ar

Re: [DNG] dbus, Was Re: Systemd-free network-manager package

2015-11-14 Thread Rainer Weikusat
Mitt Green writes: > Not sure if that was sarcasm though. > > Anyway, why do we need dbus if we can live > without it? > > I've seen these [1] cool figures explaining what it is > but neither them, > nor the article didn't give me the answer why it is > necessary. "Necessary" is a bit of a bad ca

Re: [DNG] dbus, Was Re: Systemd-free network-manager package

2015-11-14 Thread Mitt Green
Not sure if that was sarcasm though. Anyway, why do we need dbus if we can live without it? I've seen these [1] cool figures explaining what it is but neither them, nor the article didn't give me the answer why it is necessary. Mitt Reference: [1]: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/common

Re: [DNG] dbus, Was Re: Systemd-free network-manager package

2015-11-14 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 20:20:49 +0300 Mitt Green wrote: > I think ‎he should change his name to > Lennart Cluttering. Hey man, be careful of wisecracks like that. I almost broke a rib laughing. SteveT Steve Litt November 2015 featured book: Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Techn

Re: [DNG] dbus, Was Re: Systemd-free network-manager package

2015-11-14 Thread Mitt Green
I think ‎he should change his name to Lennart Cluttering. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

[DNG] dbus, Was Re: Systemd-free network-manager package

2015-11-14 Thread Mitt Green
‎dbus has its implementation in systemd already http://0pointer.net/blog/the-new-sd-bus-api-of-systemd.html What's next? Mitt --- ‎   Original Message On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:22:15 +0300 4ernov <4er...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> And I'd like to t