Re: [DNG] pepperflashplugin-nonfree

2016-08-05 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:55:20AM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote: > I suspect a number of lower profile websites will continue to employ Flash > for a long time to come. I don't give a medium-sized rodent's behind about Flash used in websites and for video DRM, but there's a significant amount of

Re: [DNG] pepperflashplugin-nonfree

2016-08-05 Thread Nate Bargmann
* On 2016 05 Aug 06:56 -0500, Stephanie Daugherty wrote: > They won't be using it much longer. Chrome and Firefox are well on > track to phase Flash out entirely over the next year or two. If only I could be so optimistic. :-) We're still receiving telecom equipment new in the box with embedded

Re: [DNG] pepperflashplugin-nonfree

2016-08-05 Thread richard lucassen
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 11:55:08 + Stephanie Daugherty wrote: > They won't be using it much longer. Chrome and Firefox are well on > track to phase Flash out entirely over the next year or two. Two years is an eternity ;-) -- richard lucassen http://contact.xaq.nl/

Re: [DNG] pepperflashplugin-nonfree

2016-08-05 Thread Stephanie Daugherty
They won't be using it much longer. Chrome and Firefox are well on track to phase Flash out entirely over the next year or two. On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:01 AM richard lucassen wrote: > On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 22:17:04 + > Stephanie Daugherty

Re: [DNG] pepperflashplugin-nonfree

2016-08-05 Thread richard lucassen
On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 22:17:04 + Stephanie Daugherty wrote: > As a side note, attempting to use an outdated version would be an > extremely bad idea, Flash seems to have a new remote hole every other > hour, so, you;d just be giving every website you visit a backdoor >

Re: [DNG] pepperflashplugin-nonfree

2016-08-04 Thread richard lucassen
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:51:46 -0500 Nate Bargmann wrote: > > $ uname -a > > Linux netbook1 4.6.0-0.bpo.1-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.6.3-1~bpo8+1 > > (2016-07-13) i686 GNU/Linux > > > > Hmmm, why not a 32 bit version? But indeed, that's the problem... > > Isn't Pepper Flash a part of

Re: [DNG] pepperflashplugin-nonfree

2016-08-04 Thread Nate Bargmann
* On 2016 04 Aug 09:44 -0500, richard lucassen wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:35:18 +0200 > "info at smallinnovations.nl" wrote: > > > A quick look at debian jessie shows that it is only available for > > AMD64 maybe that is the problem? > > U > > $ uname -a >

Re: [DNG] pepperflashplugin-nonfree

2016-08-04 Thread richard lucassen
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:35:18 +0200 "info at smallinnovations.nl" wrote: > A quick look at debian jessie shows that it is only available for > AMD64 maybe that is the problem? U $ uname -a Linux netbook1 4.6.0-0.bpo.1-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.6.3-1~bpo8+1

Re: [DNG] pepperflashplugin-nonfree

2016-08-04 Thread info at smallinnovations.nl
On 04-08-16 16:22, richard lucassen wrote: # apt-get install pepperflashplugin-nonfree Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package pepperflashplugin-nonfree is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the