Re: [DNG] policykit - another time ...

2016-07-01 Thread Didier Kryn
Le 02/07/2016 04:05, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit : On 02.07.2016 03:21, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: Or, for the few applications we really need, just implement it correctly. Just found out that on my Ubuntu Trusty system, after killing network-manager, I dont have any

Re: [DNG] policykit - another time ...

2016-07-01 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 02.07.2016 03:21, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > Or, for the few applications we really need, just implement it > correctly. Just found out that on my Ubuntu Trusty system, after killing network-manager, I dont have any (installed) dependency to polkit left (just a few things need t

Re: [DNG] policykit - another time ...

2016-07-01 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 01.07.2016 17:30, Didier Kryn wrote: > Le 01/07/2016 16:59, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit : >> what I never really actually understood: what do we really need it >> for ? what's the real-world problem behind to be solved ? > > The real problem behind was to replace sudo by someth

Re: [DNG] policykit - another time ...

2016-07-01 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 17:30:30 +0200, Didier wrote in message <57768c96.8070...@in2p3.fr>: > Le 01/07/2016 16:59, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit : > > what I never really actually understood: what do we really need it > > for ? what's the real-world problem behind to be solved ? > >

Re: [DNG] policykit - another time ...

2016-07-01 Thread Didier Kryn
Le 01/07/2016 16:59, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit : what I never really actually understood: what do we really need it for ? what's the real-world problem behind to be solved ? The real problem behind was to replace sudo by something more complicated, for the sake of complicati

Re: [DNG] policykit - another time ...

2016-07-01 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 01.07.2016 03:09, emnin...@riseup.net wrote: what I never really actually understood: what do we really need it for ? what's the real-world problem behind to be solved ? --mtx ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org

Re: [DNG] policykit - another time ...

2016-07-01 Thread Joel Roth
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 10:45:58AM +0400, anon.ud...@subscribed.udmvt.ru wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 07:55:26PM +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote: > > When i try to purge policykit-1 (which apparently is a devuan patched > > version (?): 0.105-9+devuan1 ) i'm prompted the following packages > >

Re: [DNG] policykit - another time ...

2016-06-30 Thread anon . udmvt
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 07:55:26PM +0200, emnin...@riseup.net wrote: > When i try to purge policykit-1 (which apparently is a devuan patched > version (?): 0.105-9+devuan1 ) i'm prompted the following packages > would be removed: > > > aptdaemon* colord* hplip* packagekit* packagekit-tools* p

Re: [DNG] policykit - another time ...

2016-06-30 Thread emninger
Am Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:45:23 + schrieb Daniel Reurich : > policykit is something we'd like to get rid of, but it is deeply > embedded in places so it's likely that rather then get rid of it we'd > need to provide an alternative implementation. > > That said, I haven't looked closely at those

Re: [DNG] policykit - another time ...

2016-06-30 Thread Daniel Reurich
On 01/07/16 05:55, emnin...@riseup.net wrote: > When i try to purge policykit-1 (which apparently is a devuan patched > version (?): 0.105-9+devuan1 ) i'm prompted the following packages > would be removed: > > > aptdaemon* colord* hplip* packagekit* packagekit-tools* policykit-1* > printer-d

[DNG] policykit - another time ...

2016-06-30 Thread emninger
When i try to purge policykit-1 (which apparently is a devuan patched version (?): 0.105-9+devuan1 ) i'm prompted the following packages would be removed: aptdaemon* colord* hplip* packagekit* packagekit-tools* policykit-1* printer-driver-postscript-hp* 0 updated, 0 installed , 7 to remove, 0