Hi all,
On 02/10/2016 03:00 PM, aitor_czr wrote:
El 10/02/16 a las 13:00, shraptor escribió:
I think Aitor wrote a while ago about creating a vdev package?
Aitor could you give an update on that effort?
best regards
Scooby
Hups!
:)
I just uploaded the most recent packaging of VDEV:
d
On 02/29/16 20:30, shraptor wrote:
But when I get to slim-login manager I get no keyboard.
This happened to me trying to build a Devuan_Rpi2.img (Raspberry Pi 2) :
exim4 works, but the keyboard is not detected and i can't access to the
prompt. I tried with a couple of kernels: Devuan's armmp
Didier Kryn writes:
[...]
> A few releases ago, intoducing a new init script in /etc/init.d,
> and the corresponding links in rc?.d has become a little more
> complicated, because the comments at the head of the script now
> consitute a meta-language describing the interdependencies of these
Le 29/02/2016 19:31, shraptor a écrit :
Due to real(boring?) work I've had not much time to put in on
this.
I did get devuan-jessie-amd64-alpha4-netboot.iso installed in a
VirtualBox VM.
This went without problems.
Jude had already done some basic package-building that is present on git.
H
Scooby wrote:
>However me who never ever ran debian and are somewhat unfamiliar with
>init here ran into problem getting vdev to run at start up?
There is actually a couple of documents available,
the first is README [1] and the second is How to Test vdev
[2].
>I tried putting it into /etc/rcS.
Due to real(boring?) work I've had not much time to put in on
this.
I did get devuan-jessie-amd64-alpha4-netboot.iso installed in a
VirtualBox VM.
This went without problems.
Jude had already done some basic package-building that is present on
git.
However me who never ever ran debian and
Le 12/02/2016 16:00, shraptor a écrit :
I dug up some very old correspondence I had with Jude regarding why he
uses dash
I said
"however I dont have dash on my system so I
had to symlink it to bash to make vdev run
vdevd/helpers/LINUX/*.sh files"
Here is what he said then 2015-05-22 06:25
"T
On 2016-02-12 15:34, shraptor wrote:
On 2016-02-12 10:50, Didier Kryn wrote:
Le 12/02/2016 02:54, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
Le 11/02/2016 17:04, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
[...]
It should be the name of a shell capable of running Bourne/
standard
s
On 2016-02-12 10:50, Didier Kryn wrote:
Le 12/02/2016 02:54, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
Le 11/02/2016 17:04, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
[...]
It should be the name of a shell capable of running Bourne/
standard
shell scripts. But this may not work if
On 2016-02-11 23:48, Didier Kryn wrote:
Le 11/02/2016 19:25, shraptor a écrit :
In my setup /usr/bin/dash is a symlink to /usr/bin/bash
That's a big mistake.
On any Debian system, /bin/sh points to /bin/dash, and dash
doesn't point to bash. Your system has certainly been hacked.
Yes
Rainer Weikusat writes:
[/bin/dash -> /bin/sh]
>>> There is no question here. *If* the script in question uses dash
>>> spuriously, ie, it doesn't use features specific to dash but is actually
>>> a Bourne shell script, replacing /bin/dash with /bin/sh should be
>>> fine. If not, stuff is going
Le 12/02/2016 06:21, Adam Borowski a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:41:19PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
But POSIX conformance is not enough, /bin/dash in the shebang obviously
renders portability impossible. Just look at any system script in your
Debian or Devuan system and tell me if an
Le 12/02/2016 02:54, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
Le 11/02/2016 17:04, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
[...]
It should be the name of a shell capable of running Bourne/ standard
shell scripts. But this may not work if the /bin/dash in the original
script was
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:41:19PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
> But POSIX conformance is not enough, /bin/dash in the shebang obviously
> renders portability impossible. Just look at any system script in your
> Debian or Devuan system and tell me if any of them start with #! /bin/dash.
https:/
Didier Kryn writes:
> Le 11/02/2016 17:04, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
>> Didier Kryn writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
It should be the name of a shell capable of running Bourne/ standard
shell scripts. But this may not work if the /bin/dash in the original
script was there for a reason, ie,
Le 11/02/2016 19:25, shraptor a écrit :
In my setup /usr/bin/dash is a symlink to /usr/bin/bash
That's a big mistake.
On any Debian system, /bin/sh points to /bin/dash, and dash doesn't
point to bash. Your system has certainly been hacked.
It works!
Sure, bash can process ash sc
Le 11/02/2016 17:04, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
[...]
It should be the name of a shell capable of running Bourne/ standard
shell scripts. But this may not work if the /bin/dash in the original
script was there for a reason, ie, it was using dash features.
As I alread
On 2016-02-11 10:56, Didier Kryn wrote:
Le 10/02/2016 23:37, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
Le 10/02/2016 18:50, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
[...]
2) At the time of this test campaign, the shebang line of
vdev
scripts was #!/bin/dash, which doesn't w
Didier Kryn writes:
[...]
>> It should be the name of a shell capable of running Bourne/ standard
>> shell scripts. But this may not work if the /bin/dash in the original
>> script was there for a reason, ie, it was using dash features.
>>
> As I already wrote, vdev was working well with bus
Le 10/02/2016 23:40, Steve Litt a écrit :
Didier,
If you ever come to Orlando, Florida, USA, could you please give a
presentation on Busybox and its use with initramfs systems at our local
LUG, GoLUG? Your info is tremendously geeky and tremendously useful.
Thanks for your confidence, Stev
Le 10/02/2016 23:37, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
Le 10/02/2016 18:50, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
[...]
2) At the time of this test campaign, the shebang line of vdev
scripts was #!/bin/dash, which doesn't work in Busybox. It should be
replaced by
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:11:16 +0100
Didier Kryn wrote:
> I have some experience with initramfs, and I have already tested
> vdev with Busybox in initramfs a while ago. But have no experience in
> generating a Debian/Devuan initramfs. Here's my experience with
> vdev+busybox:
>
> Ther
Didier Kryn writes:
> Le 10/02/2016 18:50, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
>> Didier Kryn writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> 2) At the time of this test campaign, the shebang line of vdev
>>> scripts was #!/bin/dash, which doesn't work in Busybox. It should be
>>> replaced by #!/bin/sh which works in all
Le 10/02/2016 18:50, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
[...]
2) At the time of this test campaign, the shebang line of vdev
scripts was #!/bin/dash, which doesn't work in Busybox. It should be
replaced by #!/bin/sh which works in all cases.
This isn't necessarily true. Both
On Wed, 2/10/16, Jaromil wrote:
Subject: Re: [DNG] vdev packaging effort ( was: state of what's working for
modern desktop usage)
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2016, 8:09 AM
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, shraptor wrote:
> Thank you Adam for offering help,
Didier Kryn writes:
[...]
> 2) At the time of this test campaign, the shebang line of vdev
> scripts was #!/bin/dash, which doesn't work in Busybox. It should be
> replaced by #!/bin/sh which works in all cases.
This isn't necessarily true. Both dash and the usual busybox sh are
forks of th
On 2016-02-10 15:11, Didier Kryn wrote:
Le 10/02/2016 12:02, shraptor a écrit :
On 2016-02-10 00:35, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 09:20:32AM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 09:15:28AM +0100, shraptor wrote:
> >Vdev is still in its final stages of development,
On 2016-02-10 15:09, Jaromil wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, shraptor wrote:
Thank you Adam for offering help, Are you knowledgeable on initramfs
in general? I think we need someone versed in debian/devuan
initramfs generation with hooks and so on?
on irc #devuan there is gdm85 who is an expert
Le 10/02/2016 12:02, shraptor a écrit :
On 2016-02-10 00:35, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 09:20:32AM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 09:15:28AM +0100, shraptor wrote:
> >Vdev is still in its final stages of development, as far as I know.
> >Running on developp
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, shraptor wrote:
> Thank you Adam for offering help, Are you knowledgeable on initramfs
> in general? I think we need someone versed in debian/devuan
> initramfs generation with hooks and so on?
on irc #devuan there is gdm85 who is an expert on this. He is also in
Amsterd
El 10/02/16 a las 13:00, shraptor escribió:
I think Aitor wrote a while ago about creating a vdev package?
Aitor could you give an update on that effort?
best regards
Scooby
Hups!
:)
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists
On 2016-02-10 00:35, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 09:20:32AM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 09:15:28AM +0100, shraptor wrote:
> >Vdev is still in its final stages of development, as far as I know.
> >Running on developpment asd some test systems, but still bei
32 matches
Mail list logo
