On 170303-20:40-0500, Christopher Clements wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 12:03:02AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> >I haven't yet gotten to the point of using privacy I don't need
> >personally, as is obvious by this unsigned email.
>
> I always sign my messages.
Me too.
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 12:03:02AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
I haven't yet gotten to the point of using privacy I don't need
personally, as is obvious by this unsigned email.
I always sign my messages.
From what I understand, if my message is signed (and the signature is
valid), then it is proo
> And then there's what Jamie said: By all being private, we make the
> truly private stand out less. I haven't yet gotten to the point of
> using privacy I don't need personally, as is obvious by this unsigned
> email.
> SteveT
A friend of mine has a bit of a conspiracy theory going - asking why
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:13:25 -0500
Christopher Clements wrote:
> As a curious "I have nothing to hide" type of guy, I'm wondering if
> there are any other legitimate reasons to use this stuff.
My answer is that someday you will have something to hide. I don't know
if it will be a disease, a cr
On 01/03/2017 at 06:42 Kurtis Hanna wrote:
[...]
>> Also, (no disrespect meant, just an innocent question),
>> who are these types of distributions meant for, apart from
>> the paranoid, whistleblowers, drug lords, and high-profile criminals?
>> (Please don't think I'm lumping them all together.)
On Wed, 01 Mar 2017, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> > The problem with having a nice brightly colored "TOR" icon on your iPhone
> > is that the Jackboots can easily see it and know you're using it. But if
> > *EVERYONE* has it on their phone, it's no longer nearly as useful for
> > identifying people of
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:42:00AM +, Kurtis Hanna wrote:
[snip]
Thanks, that was very insightful.
--
GPG Key: 0769 AFCF 681E F61E 2137 F4CB 5044 1726 610D 5AE0
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.o
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:01:53 -0600 (CST)
ja...@beau.org wrote:
> Another reason for those who have relatively little to hide - to help
> provide "herd immunity" for those who actually have legitimate reasons to
> hide hard.
>
> The problem with having a nice brightly colored "TOR" icon on your iPh
On Wed, 01 Mar 2017, ja...@beau.org wrote:
> The problem with having a nice brightly colored "TOR" icon on your iPhone
> is that the Jackboots can easily see it and know you're using it. But if
> *EVERYONE* has it on their phone, it's no longer nearly as useful for
> identifying people of interes
> Quoting Christopher Clements (bcn...@gmail.com):
>> I honestly can't think of any legitimate, ethically sound use of "extreme
>> privacy" software apart from whistleblowing and sticking it to extremely
>> aggressive advertisers like AT&T's clients.
> Do you have drapes (or equivalent) in your b
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:35:13 -0800, Rick wrote in message
<20170301073513.gb30...@linuxmafia.com>:
> Quoting Arnt Karlsen (a...@iaksess.no):
>
> > ..now, can we build on heads to get a safe alternative to
> > https://qubes-os.org/ ?
>
> Pretty please?
>
> Qubes is a near-essential tool for Ope
Quoting Arnt Karlsen (a...@iaksess.no):
> ..now, can we build on heads to get a safe alternative to
> https://qubes-os.org/ ?
Pretty please?
Qubes is a near-essential tool for Operations high-security work, and
about the only serious design flaw is the one Arnt points to.
_
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:21:49 +0100, Adam wrote in message
<20170228212149.spuhnetb623om...@angband.pl>:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:06:16PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:12:34PM +0100, parazyd wrote:
> > > heads 0.0 is out!
> > > It finally happened and it's not vapor
Christopher Clements:
> Is there really any way to be 100% sure that a project and/or team
> member is not compromised?
No. This is why 3rd party audits of the source code is important. If the
source code is not fully available to everyone, then it can not be fully
audited. Tails has non-free soft
Quoting Christopher Clements (bcn...@gmail.com):
> Is there really any way to be 100% sure that a project and/or team
> member is not compromised?
Surprisingly, sometimes interesting discussions about security are
possible after the newcomer establishes that the answer to this basic
question is a
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:21:49PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:06:16PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:12:34PM +0100, parazyd wrote:
> heads 0.0 is out!
> It finally happened and it's not vaporware!
It's out, it's not vaporware, it boots into a V
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 04:06:16PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:12:34PM +0100, parazyd wrote:
> > heads 0.0 is out!
> > It finally happened and it's not vaporware!
>
> It's out, it's not vaporware, it boots into a VM or bare hardware
> from USB, but...
>
> What Is It?
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:12:34PM +0100, parazyd wrote:
> > heads 0.0 is out!
> > It finally happened and it's not vaporware!
>
> It's out, it's not vaporware, it boots into a VM or bare hardware
> from USB, but...
>
> What Is It?
You continue looking
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:12:34PM +0100, parazyd wrote:
> heads 0.0 is out!
> It finally happened and it's not vaporware!
It's out, it's not vaporware, it boots into a VM or bare hardware
from USB, but...
What Is It?
-- hendrik
>
> heads 0.0 is a preview live CD of what heads is going to be a
19 matches
Mail list logo
