Re: [DNG] Ethernet names revisited - a workaround (but the basic question still remains)

2020-12-12 Thread tito via Dng
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 23:11:52 +0100 Antony Stone wrote: > On Saturday 12 December 2020 at 14:15:53, Antony Stone wrote: > > > Historically, I've been used to udev > > and /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent- net.rules doing this, where I > > can specify the name I want for each interface according

Re: [DNG] Ethernet names revisited - a workaround (but the basic question still remains)

2020-12-12 Thread Antony Stone
On Sunday 13 December 2020 at 00:01:11, Florian Zieboll via Dng wrote: > On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 23:11:52 +0100 Antony Stone wrote: > > I would still *really like* to know: > > > > 1. how can I get 70-persistent-net.rules to carry on working as it > > used to, under Beowulf? (I never had to do this

Re: [DNG] Ethernet names revisited - a workaround (but the basic question still remains)

2020-12-12 Thread Florian Zieboll via Dng
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 23:11:52 +0100 Antony Stone wrote: > I would still *really like* to know: > > 1. how can I get 70-persistent-net.rules to carry on working as it > used to, under Beowulf? (I never had to do this sort of workaround > in Jessie or before.) Hallo Antony, do I understand

Re: [DNG] Ethernet names revisited - a workaround (but the basic question still remains)

2020-12-12 Thread Antony Stone
On Saturday 12 December 2020 at 14:15:53, Antony Stone wrote: > Historically, I've been used to udev and /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent- > net.rules doing this, where I can specify the name I want for each > interface according to its MAC address. > 1. how can I get 70-persistent-net.rules to