Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Considering the fact that many Linux users moan about not being able
> to run the latest "shiny" software, and sometimes even complain and
> insist they want their MS Windows applications on their Linux
> machines, I have to concede them, that this time systemd scored an
>
I apologize for top-posting, but I have no idea what you are talking about.
For the record, I am not fond of GRUB2 either.
Peter Olson
> On August 9, 2016 at 1:52 AM Edward Bartolo wrote:
>
> Considering the fact that many Linux users moan about not being able
> to run the latest "shiny" softw
Considering the fact that many Linux users moan about not being able
to run the latest "shiny" software, and sometimes even complain and
insist they want their MS Windows applications on their Linux
machines, I have to concede them, that this time systemd scored an
extra brownie point in their favo
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 22:03:31 + (UTC)
Go Linux wrote:
> I posted a link to this response at the FDN link posted above. This
> was the response from the author of the howto:
>
> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=621972#p621972
>
> He concludes:
>
> ". . . I would prefer to use the sy
On 09/08/16 06:03, Go Linux wrote:
I posted a link to this response at the FDN link posted above. This was the
response from the author of the howto:
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=621972#p621972
He concludes:
". . . I would prefer to use the systemd-supplied components (systemd-b
On Sun, 8/7/16, Adam Borowski wrote:
Subject: Re: [DNG] SystemD's brownie points over non-systemd OSs.
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Sunday, August 7, 2016, 9:42 PM
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:31:10PM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&p
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 08:44:39AM +0300, Aldemir Akpinar wrote:
> > Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:31:10PM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> >
> > On the other hand, full-machine virtualization costs you the max of
> > assigned
> > memory to that system, at all time.
>
> Going off-topic but I just wanted t
On 08/08/16 13:44, Aldemir Akpinar wrote:
Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:31:10PM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
On the other hand, full-machine virtualization costs you the max of
assigned
memory to that system, at all time.
Going off-topic but I just wanted to correct this statement,
> Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:31:10PM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>
> On the other hand, full-machine virtualization costs you the max of
> assigned
> memory to that system, at all time.
>
Going off-topic but I just wanted to correct this statement, when you're
using full machine virtualization in th
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:31:10PM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&p=621842#p621842
>
> Excuse me for the topic title. But the above link at first looked like
> some inherent advantage in using SystemD. However, after a little
> reflection, a couple of mi
On 08/08/16 00:31, Edward Bartolo wrote:
Hi All,
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&p=621842#p621842
Excuse me for the topic title. But the above link at first looked like
some inherent advantage in using SystemD. However, after a little
reflection, a couple of minutes, it seems there
11 matches
Mail list logo
