m: Isaac Dunham<mailto:ibid...@gmail.com>
Sent: 5/7/2015 8:05 PM
To: Alex 'AdUser' Z<mailto:ad_u...@runbox.com>
Cc: dng@lists.dyne.org<mailto:dng@lists.dyne.org>
Subject: Re: [Dng] Which source version fo systemd are you stripping code from?
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 11:40:28A
ailto:ja...@realitysend.com>
Sent: 5/7/2015 7:46 PM
To: dng@lists.dyne.org<mailto:dng@lists.dyne.org>
Subject: Re: [Dng] Which source version fo systemd are you stripping code from?
On 05/07/2015 09:59 PM, James Powell wrote:
> Etcnet was very involved with scripts which was always a p
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 11:40:28AM +1000, Alex 'AdUser' Z wrote:
> > Netplug, NetworkManager, inetd, xinetd, dhcpcd, and dhcp(client) to name a
> > few already did the same work.
> > Netplug is possibly the lightest weight of them all and provides
> > connectivity device management as well as net
On 05/07/2015 09:59 PM, James Powell wrote:
Etcnet was very involved with scripts which was always a problem for
Red Hat. Many Red Hat scripts have been known for being substandard in
quality and reliability, possibly a reason why they wanted systemd so bad.
However, any daemon can work well i
are corrected properly.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Alex 'AdUser' Z<mailto:ad_u...@runbox.com>
Sent: 5/7/2015 6:40 PM
To: dng@lists.dyne.org<mailto:dng@lists.dyne.org>
Subject: Re: [Dng] Which source version fo systemd are you stripping
> Netplug, NetworkManager, inetd, xinetd, dhcpcd, and dhcp(client) to name a
> few already did the same work.
> Netplug is possibly the lightest weight of them all and provides connectivity
> device management as well as net connectivity service.
FYI, there is (was?) another alternative:
https:/
e: Thu, 7 May 2015 11:27:10 +0100
> From: l...@diamand.org
> To: jud...@gmail.com
> CC: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Subject: Re: [Dng] Which source version fo systemd are you stripping code
> from?
>
> You might want to take a look at uselessd, which I think is an attem
You might want to take a look at uselessd, which I think is an attempt
to do something similar.
http://uselessd.darknedgy.net/
I think even if it turns out to be impossible, it will still be
instructive! Good luck!
On 7 May 2015 at 08:24, Jude Nelson wrote:
>
>> Since I have time on my hands, I
> Since I have time on my hands, I would like to give a try stripping
> the bare minimum of necessary functions from systemd. I know the task
> is complex. If I fail, it will not be the end of the universe.
>
> Which systemd source version are you using? I am assuming it should be
> version: 215-17
