Fred Morris wrote:
> ... Try setting up an RPZ with
> a dozen or so of the most common third-party "content providers", and tell
> me about your page load performance!
say more?
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
https://
If you want URIs in the right hand side, just go with NAPTR. If browsers
supported transparent URI redirection (i.e. what most DNS providers call
URL forwarding and implement as an HTTP 301 response) then NAPTR is likely
the way to do it.
-Anthony
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Patrik Fältström
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.OrG. 3485 IN SRV 50 10 80 pkg0.bme.freebsd.org.
> _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.OrG. 3485 IN SRV 10 10 80 pkg0.isc.freebsd.org.
> _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.OrG. 3485 IN SRV 90 10 80 pkg0.ydx.freebsd.org.
> _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.OrG. 3485
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message
> ,
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Colm_MacC=E1rthaigh?= writes:
>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
>> >
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> > ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> > _http._tcp.pkg.freebs
On Sat, 5 Apr 2014, [ISO-8859-1] Colm MacC?rthaigh wrote:
> [...]
> It's speculation on my part, but that behavior might be holding back SRV.
> It's probably a hard-sell to expect browsers to perform two queries instead
> of one, and to double the time they spend in DNS resolution.
No offense inte
In message ,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Colm_MacC=E1rthaigh?= writes:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >
> > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
> >
>
> ...
>
>
> > ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> > _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.OrG. 3485 IN SRV 50 10 80
> > pkg0.bme.freebsd.org.
> > _h
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
>
...
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.OrG. 3485 IN SRV 50 10 80
> pkg0.bme.freebsd.org.
> _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.OrG. 3485 IN SRV 10 10 80
> pkg0.isc.freebsd.org.
> _http
The packaging system uses it.
; <<>> DiG 9.10.0b2 <<>> _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org SRV
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 8334
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 2
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, fla
On Apr 5, 2014, at 17:10 , Doug Barton wrote:
> On 04/05/2014 01:51 PM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2014, at 23:26 , Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>>> FreeBSD is using _http._tcp today for some of their services.
>>
>> Do you know for which ones?
>
> portaudit for one.
; <<>> DiG 9.8.
On 04/05/2014 01:51 PM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
On Apr 4, 2014, at 23:26 , Mark Andrews wrote:
FreeBSD is using _http._tcp today for some of their services.
Do you know for which ones?
portaudit for one.
Doug
___
dns-operations mailing list
dn
On Apr 4, 2014, at 23:26 , Mark Andrews wrote:
> FreeBSD is using _http._tcp today for some of their services.
Do you know for which ones?
; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P1 <<>> IN SRV _http._tcp.freebsd.org
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 20566
;;
On 04/04/2014 02:20 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
[Warning: sloppy terminology, for instance, "root" is not used in the
usual DNS meaning.]
http://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-cname-flattening-rfc-compliant-cnames-at-a-domains-root
Funny idea but it works only if your DNS is hosted at Cloud
Mark Andrews wrote:
> ... The big barrier is people saying "there is a big barrier"
sort of like EDNS, DNSSEC, IPv6.
i guess there's never time to do it right,
but always time to do it over?
vixie
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@li
In message <21310.50033.650900.982...@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com>, David C Law
rence writes:
> Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> > I was not able to find a real example: all the companies mentioned in
> > the article as being happy users have their Web server at CloudFlare,
> > where this service is
In message ,
Anthony Eden writes:
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:36 PM, David C Lawrence wrote:
> >
> >
> > Bring me a world in which SRV for HTTP without location bar
> > redirection is commonplace, and we'd be happy to encourage its use.
> >
>
> I agree 100%. I'd much rather it be done on the
In message <533ec5c4.4050...@tiggee.com>, David Miller writes:
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
>
> On 04/04/2014 06:54 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > Or one can add SRV or some other record that does the name
> > to server mapping and not have to do all this b
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 01:24:03PM -0700, Matthew Ghali wrote:
>
> Second, to call this record synthesis a “CNAME” is a disservice to the
> industry.
While I agree with that (and was of course piqued by the lousy
description of why you can't have a CNAME at the apex -- err, sorry,
"root" -- of
On Apr 4, 2014, at 2:20 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> [Warning: sloppy terminology, for instance, "root" is not used in the
> usual DNS meaning.]
>
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-cname-flattening-rfc-compliant-cnames-at-a-domains-root
>
> Funny idea but it works only if your DNS i
> From: David Miller
> Everything old is new again.
>
> I have this brand new earth shattering idea to suspend a seat on a frame
> between two wheels, attach a sprocket to the rear wheel, and by means of
> a chain between the rear sprocket and a rotating pedal assembly allow a
> user to sit on a
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 09:12:52AM -0700, Edward Lewis wrote:
> This all smells like something that the IETF is suited to help with. I mean,
> operators, multiple implementations, desires for interoperability...
it appears to me as one of these 'in the privacy of your own
bed^Wimplementation'
t
rc.net] On Behalf Of David C Lawrence
[t...@akamai.com]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 11:34 AM
To: dns-operati...@mail.dns-oarc.net
Subject: Re: [dns-operations] Introducing CNAME Flattening: RFC-Compliant
CNAMEs at a Domain's Root
Anthony Eden writes:
> Ah, I didn't know that. Have yo
Anthony Eden writes:
> Ah, I didn't know that. Have you or others from Akamai ever written up
> anything about your implementation?
I doubt anything publicly, though we do have internal documentation.
There might have been a non-technical press release back in 2003, but
this routine of writing sem
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:40 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
>
> > I've been thinking about writing an RFC for this, but I've never
> > actually done it, and it will take some time to do, however I think
> > defining how an ALIAS record will synthesize its response is probably
> > something we need at th
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:36 PM, David C Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> Bring me a world in which SRV for HTTP without location bar
> redirection is commonplace, and we'd be happy to encourage its use.
>
I agree 100%. I'd much rather it be done on the client than to have to deal
with implementing it on our
On 04/04/2014 06:54 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> Or one can add SRV or some other record that does the name
> to server mapping and not have to do all this behind the
> scenes stuff.
One would need to add several SRV records, if the host provided several
services. One would also
On 04/04/2014 06:23 AM, Anthony Eden wrote:
> While CloudFlare did not give any credit to previous work done (which
> sort of pisses me off, but whatever), they are essentially implementing
> the same thing that Amazon did with their ALIAS implementation, the same
> thing that we did with the DNSim
Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> I was not able to find a real example: all the companies mentioned in
> the article as being happy users have their Web server at CloudFlare,
> where this service is useless.
I agree, it is a little peculiar, with their anycast HTTP servers.
You can see that some of t
>From: dns-operations-boun...@mail.dns-oarc.net ...
>Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:20 AM
>To: dns-operati...@dns-oarc.net
>Subject: [dns-operations] Introducing CNAME Flattening: RFC-Compliant CNAMEs
> at a Domain's Root
>
>http://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-cnam
Or one can add SRV or some other record that does the name
to server mapping and not have to do all this behind the
scenes stuff.
It's not like MX records didn't exist when the web was
created or that we weren't adding new records to the DNS.
Indir
While CloudFlare did not give any credit to previous work done (which sort
of pisses me off, but whatever), they are essentially implementing the same
thing that Amazon did with their ALIAS implementation, the same thing that
we did with the DNSimple ALIAS implementation, and the same thing that
DN
On 04-04-14 11:20, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-cname-flattening-rfc-compliant-cnames-at-a-domains-root
>
> Funny idea
Indeed.
Until you want to use DNSSEC.
--
Marco
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
__
[Warning: sloppy terminology, for instance, "root" is not used in the
usual DNS meaning.]
http://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-cname-flattening-rfc-compliant-cnames-at-a-domains-root
Funny idea but it works only if your DNS is hosted at CloudFlare.
I was not able to find a real example: all th
32 matches
Mail list logo
