[dns-wg] ripe.net axfr

2014-12-12 Thread Antonio Prado
hi, can I axfr ripe.net zone? thank you -- antonio

Re: [dns-wg] ripe.net axfr

2014-12-13 Thread Antonio Prado
On 12/12/14 6:47 PM, Antonio Prado wrote: > can I axfr ripe.net zone? I'll restate with different words: why pri.authdns.ripe.net should allow AXFR ripe.net zone? just asking thank you -- antonio

Re: [dns-wg] Yeti DNS and the RIPE NCC

2016-05-25 Thread Antonio Prado
On 5/24/16 2:41 PM, Shane Kerr wrote: > Please let us know what you think about this idea. I'm happy to answer > any questions about the project or what it would mean for the RIPE NCC > to run a Yeti root server. hi, as a participant to YETI project I warmly encourage RIPE NCC (as well as the RIP

Re: [dns-wg] Yeti DNS and the RIPE NCC

2016-05-25 Thread Antonio Prado
On 5/25/16 12:32 PM, Amreesh Phokeer wrote: > Hi all, > > Just want to know, how far or how close YETI is as compared to the Open > Root [1] project from what I read on their website, I think they cannot be compared. think of yeti as a testbed for research and experiments: the project should ter

Re: [dns-wg] Verisign to provide secondary DNS services for the RIPE NCC’s zones

2016-10-18 Thread Antonio Prado
On 10/18/16 11:36 AM, Jim Reid wrote: > The contractual terms are implementation detail and therefore out of scope > for the WG > if we have reason to believe the RFP and/or contract was unfair or defective > in some way. > The WG must not and can’t (try to) micromanage the NCC’s DNS team. jim

Re: [dns-wg] co-chair appointment: yet another reminder

2016-10-22 Thread Antonio Prado
On 10/17/16 3:18 PM, Jim Reid wrote: > I’d appreciate it if more members of the WG spoke up my support to shane -- antonio

[dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries

2018-06-10 Thread Antonio Prado via dns-wg
hi, I hope you can help me on a not-so-related-to-DNS question. does the SLD .gov.* within european countries' ccTLDs identify only central government bodies and not local government or other public administrations as well? thank you -- antonio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signa

Re: [dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries

2018-06-12 Thread Antonio Prado via dns-wg
On 6/12/18 1:32 PM, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > There are links to central government departments, local authorities, > statutory bodies, > state-supported services, and tourist attractions. I can't find any city as third level under .gov.ie. www.gov.ie seems a directory of links. so may I assume t

Re: [dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries

2018-06-12 Thread Antonio Prado via dns-wg
On 6/12/18 1:43 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > I guess most answers will be "it depends" :-) ok, just to recap: .gov.uk --> central and local .gov.ie --> central .gov.nl --> neither central nor local .go(u)v.fr --> central .gov.it --> central and local (to cancel local by the end of 2018) any

Re: [dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries

2018-06-13 Thread Antonio Prado via dns-wg
On 6/13/18 9:27 AM, Rafał Galiński wrote: > The gov.pl domain is reserved for registration only for designated entities. > Subscribers of names in .gov.pl domain may be public authorities, > professional self-government bodies, etc .. hi, is it possible to sum that .gov.pl is not for central gove

Re: [dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries

2018-06-14 Thread Antonio Prado via dns-wg
On 6/14/18 7:09 AM, Peter Koch wrote: > I'm really curious what this little survey is really up to. hi, a 2009 law forced any italian public administration to acquire a domain name under the SLD .gov.it. instead, last february 2018 the italian digital agency (at the prime minister's office) dete

Re: [dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries

2018-06-25 Thread Antonio Prado via dns-wg
On 6/25/18 12:38 AM, Peter Koch wrote: > Colleagues within CENTR (representing ccTLDs within Europe, but also > beyond as shown below) were kind enough to provide first hand information > for the following list of TLDs: Peter, thank you for this useful summary. I took a parallel survey during th

Re: [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria

2019-06-12 Thread Antonio Prado via dns-wg
On 6/11/19 11:10 PM, Jonas Frey wrote: > This whole BCP (whatever that includes in detail) is nowhere > documented.  hi, to be honest there is a meaningful BCP about the topic: RFC 5358, BCP 140, Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks. under "Recommended configuration" para

Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer to co-chair the DNS wg

2019-10-01 Thread Antonio Prado via dns-wg
On 10/1/19 9:07 AM, Dave Knight wrote: >> If selected again you have my commitment for the next 3-years. support -- antonio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [dns-wg] DNS reverse configuration

2021-10-06 Thread Antonio Prado via dns-wg
On 10/6/21 8:45 AM, ANTONETTI Gilles wrote: So, my question is it possible to declare 2 different DNS for delegation only for the /24 ? hi, NS delegations (at /16 or /24 for IPv4; at each nibble for IPv6) have no constraints. so you can differentiate at will your declarations in domain: obj