On Dec 13, 2011, at 1:52 PM, Jason wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:53:09AM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> On 08/12/11 15:48, Jason wrote:
>>> I found this [1] comment from 2010 regarding source control. Have you
>>> considered migrating to one? I only ask because I'm partial to git (I
>>> us
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:53:09AM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 08/12/11 15:48, Jason wrote:
> > I found this [1] comment from 2010 regarding source control. Have you
> > considered migrating to one? I only ask because I'm partial to git (I
> > use it all day, every day ;-) ), and I'd like to
2011-12-13, 12:13:39:
Cyril Plisko wrote:
> > Simon: "I'll be in a position to do stuff like making git access available.
> > I'm"
>
> What about github ?
>
Gitorious is OK.
Easier, I'd say.
--
jasiu
On 13/12/11 14:32, Ed W wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 17:40, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> Am 11.12.2011 20:00, schrieb Ed W:
>>> How can I tell dnsmasq that it's effectively authoritive for reverse
>>> lookups for private IP ranges and prevent upstream lookups? I do have
>>> "bogus-priv" set. Dnsmasq-1.58
Hi,
Excerpts from Ed W's message of 2011-12-13 14:22:25 +:
> Seconded on the github idea
Before the concern of putting your data only to some external place comes up:
Git supports multiple remotes under one name, so you can easily mirror your
stuff to your private git server, too. Github makes
On 12/12/2011 17:40, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 11.12.2011 20:00, schrieb Ed W:
This is zeroconfiguration DNS-based service discovery stuff. Check
Wikipedia for "Zeroconf".
Dec 11 18:28:08 localhost daemon.info dnsmasq[590]: forwarded
dr._dns-sd._udp.225.177.159.10.in-addr.arpa to 8.8.8.8
D
>> I did use a dhclient hook to tell it to stop writing to /etc/resolv.conf at
>> all,
>> so that resolv.conf has only 127.0.0.1 as the nameserver.
>
> This will work as well, mind sharing with me how you did this?
>
> I know this is OT for the list so if you just want to email me
> privately th
On 12/12/2011 17:40, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 11.12.2011 20:00, schrieb Ed W:
>> I try and block these using:
>>
>>server=/111.168.192.in-addr.arpa/127.0.0.1
> The logs above show queries for a different address, namely for
> 10.159.177.225.
>
> The server line filters after query contents,
On 12/12/2011 17:40, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 11.12.2011 20:00, schrieb Ed W:
>> How can I tell dnsmasq that it's effectively authoritive for reverse
>> lookups for private IP ranges and prevent upstream lookups? I do have
>> "bogus-priv" set. Dnsmasq-1.58
> By adding another server-line for 1
On 13/12/2011 10:13, Cyril Plisko wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Simon Kelley
> wrote:
>> On 08/12/11 15:48, Jason wrote:
>>> Simon,
>>>
>>> I found this [1] comment from 2010 regarding source control. Have you
>>> considered migrating to one? I only ask because I'm partial to git (
Hello,
unfortunately there are not all names in the same domain.
And I am not in control of the real name server. As far as I know the admin of
the real server, it is likely that this server is missconfigured.
A tcpdump of my machine doesn't show any outwards IPv6 traffic. There are a
view
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 08/12/11 15:48, Jason wrote:
>> Simon,
>>
>> I found this [1] comment from 2010 regarding source control. Have you
>> considered migrating to one? I only ask because I'm partial to git (I
>> use it all day, every day ;-) ), and I'd like
On 12/12/11 08:54, Schneidhuber, Bruno wrote:
Hello,
even if dnsmasq finds a name in /etc/hosts, it forwards a name query to
the real dns server. These servers dont't find the name and the name
query doesn't return until the query to the real servers times out.
As I understand from mails from th
On 08/12/11 15:48, Jason wrote:
Simon,
I found this [1] comment from 2010 regarding source control. Have you
considered migrating to one? I only ask because I'm partial to git (I
use it all day, every day ;-) ), and I'd like to submit a patch.
Please do. I'm in the process of updating the OS
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Matt Ginzton wrote:
> I did use a dhclient hook to tell it to stop writing to /etc/resolv.conf at
> all,
> so that resolv.conf has only 127.0.0.1 as the nameserver.
>
> Matt
>
This will work as well, mind sharing with me how you did this?
I know this is OT fo
15 matches
Mail list logo
