On Sep 27, 2014, at 7:01 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 27.09.2014 um 12:01 schrieb Roy Marples:
>> On Friday 26 Sep 2014 21:14:20 Simon Kelley wrote:
>>> This is just a heads-up that if you're using the --dhcp-script option in
>>> dnsmasq, and the script you're calling is being interpreted by
Am 27.09.2014 um 12:01 schrieb Roy Marples:
> On Friday 26 Sep 2014 21:14:20 Simon Kelley wrote:
>> This is just a heads-up that if you're using the --dhcp-script option in
>> dnsmasq, and the script you're calling is being interpreted by bash,
>> then you're affected by the shellshock bug.
>>
>> T
On Friday 26 Sep 2014 21:14:20 Simon Kelley wrote:
> This is just a heads-up that if you're using the --dhcp-script option in
> dnsmasq, and the script you're calling is being interpreted by bash,
> then you're affected by the shellshock bug.
>
> The bug allows execution of arbitrary code containe
On 26/09/14 22:45, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote:
> I know this could be found in the code, and my own systems have busybox not
> bash, but I thought I'd ask for general interest:
>
> Is this a matter only of the shebang line in the script, or does dnsmasq
> use `system()` to run it, meaning that c
