Hi Kevin,
Ignoring all naks – would be, but the fix is different.
That fix ignores all naks except from the selected/requested server only, it’s
ok.
Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko
From: Kevin Benton [mailto:blak...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:32 AM
To: Vladislav Grishe
Hi,
Is there a pointer to the format of the lease database somewhere? I'm
interested in what the last column is used for. It looks like the MAC of
the client with an extra hex pair at the front.
I just wanted to check if there is documentation somewhere before I did
into the code to reverse the p
That fix is interesting. Doesn't ignoring a NAK sort of defeat the point of
the 'authoritative' NAKing in the first place?
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Vladislav Grishenko
wrote:
> > On 02/02/2015 05:47 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> The one thing I'm curious about is if dnsmasq is re
> On 02/02/2015 05:47 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
> >>
> >>> The one thing I'm curious about is if dnsmasq is restarted while a
> >>> VM holds a lease, how will it respond? As someone else has
> >>> pointed-out to me - isc-dhcp will respond with a DHCPNAK in that
> >>> case, and wondered why there woul
On 02/02/2015 05:47 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
The one thing I'm curious about is if dnsmasq is restarted while a VM
holds a lease, how will it respond? As someone else has pointed-out to
me - isc-dhcp will respond with a DHCPNAK in that case, and wondered why
there would be a difference with dnsm
