Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] split-horizon

Sorry for the late answer but I was on holiday. I tested the patch from git and it works as expected. Thank you a lot. On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 06/06/15 09:59, Ermanno Scaglione wrote: > > auth-server=owncloud.local.lan,wan > >

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] fe80/10 link local dns forwarding

Hi Kevin, There's RFC 6303 for that, current status is best current practice. As for dnsmasq implementation of that recommendations, it could depend on auth support, since it enables zone support. Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko > -Original Message- > From: Dnsmasq-discuss

[Dnsmasq-discuss] fe80/10 link local dns forwarding

Hi All, After enabling dnsmasq's dns logging the other day I was a little surprised to see queries for fe80:: being forwarded to my ISP's resolvers. I'd say that they're extremely unlikely to know anything about my link local stuff so as a solution I've added the following to my config:

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] fe80/10 link local dns forwarding

Ahh, excellent! Very helpful Vladislav. Looks like a have a few more zones to not leak to the Internet :-) Thanks, Kevin On 07/09/2015 15:54, Vladislav Grishenko wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > There's RFC 6303 for that, current status is best current practice. > As for dnsmasq implementation of that

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS-over-TLS

On Sep 7, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Matt Taggart wrote: > Hi, > > Have you seen this draft for adding TLS to DNS? > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dprive-start-tls-for-dns-01 > > What would it take to implement in dnsmasq? > Both as a server and as a client. Take a

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DLV and DnsMasq

> but I cannot find any option for DLV. ISC will stop accepting domains for DLV in 2016 and will terminate service alltogether in 2017 [1] -JP [1] https://dlv.isc.org ___ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk

[Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS-over-TLS

Hi, Have you seen this draft for adding TLS to DNS? https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dprive-start-tls-for-dns-01 What would it take to implement in dnsmasq? Both as a server and as a client. I am thinking the client support would initially be more interesting, as upstream DNS servers