Is it possible to specify an NS record? I am attempting to setup a fully
working DNS server (i.e. ns1.danols.com) however it appears not to be
possible because dnsmasq does not return a NS record.
--
(Dnsmasq-discuss)
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing lis
Simon Kelley (si...@thekelleys.org.uk) wrote on Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 06:26:21PM
BRST:
> On 19/10/15 14:01, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > I wonder if I could encourage you to look at extending the 'bogus-priv'
> > option to include some IPv6 zones? In essence dnsmasq is cur
I'm stumbling on an important problem that looks like a bug in dnsmasq. Clients
declared statically in a zone are being denied their address with the message
"no addresses available":
Oct 20 09:56:10 dnsmasq-dhcp[18342]: 6947286 available DHCPv6 subnet:
2801:82:80ff:7f05::/64
Oct 20 09:56:10 dnsm
Is there any sort of standards document that explains how this is
supposed to work in EFI?
Cheers,
Simon.
On 19/10/15 12:54, Michael Kuron wrote:
> I made some changes to dnsmasq (patch below) that remove the PXE menu system
> (the option 43 stuff) if there’s only one menu entry and put the b
To add to the list of canonical uses for dnsmasq: DHCP and DNS services
to VMs and containers in things like OpenStack. These typically use
RFC1918 addresses (there's no point in being able to spin a new VM in
seconds if you have to go buy it a real IPv4 address on the black market
first.) so t
On 15/10/15 12:39, Ed W wrote:
> Hi, I'm not quite clear from the manual pages, so can I please get a
> definitive answer:
>
> - Am I safe to use to assign a static IP allocation using --dhcp-host
> options, *within* an IP range allocated using --dhcp-range ?
>
> Specifically, whilst I realise th
On 19/10/15 14:01, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I wonder if I could encourage you to look at extending the 'bogus-priv'
> option to include some IPv6 zones? In essence dnsmasq is currently
> forwarding ipv6 link-local reverse queries when in reality root servers
> aren't going t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dnsmasq doesn't insert a DHCP lease into the database when it gets a
SOLICIT, that happens when it gets a REQUEST.
I think there are two things here. The first is that openWRT doesn't
keep the lease database in non-volatile storage. Dnsmasq really
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/10/15 01:59, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> A non-recursive upstream is of little use. I suggest putting a
> warning in the logs and leaving it as is.
There is already a warning if any upstream server is not recursive.
Simon.
>
> _