[Dnsmasq-discuss] Should results from --server be cached?

2018-03-12 Thread Michael Tolan
Hi all, I want to ask whether queries for A records matching a --server argument are expected to be cached. I'm running an instance of dnsmasq with the following arguments: dnsmasq -k --all-servers --cache-size=1 --log-facility=- --server=/cluster.local/127.0.0.1#10053

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Allow specifying a 0.0.0.0 netmask in dhcp-range for relays.

2018-03-12 Thread Yuki Nisiwaki
Hello Nicolas I missed this point.Thanks. > dhcp-option=option:netmask,255.255.0.0 anyway. But as you already mentioned, still I have to specify at least 2 dhcp-range with /1 to cover all subnets since dnsmasq doesn't consider netmask 0 we intentionally specified. your patch seems good to

[Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Allow specifying a 0.0.0.0 netmask in dhcp-range for relays.

2018-03-12 Thread Nicolas Cavallari
When using a DHCP relay, the netmask in dhcp-range is matched against giaddr (or the link selection suboption) to determine on which range the address should be allocated. However, in some cases, you want to ignore this mechanism, because your relay, clients and your DHCP server are not in the

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Is there any use case for "--dhcp-range=0.0.0.0, static, 0.0.0.0" to support all subnet

2018-03-12 Thread Yuki Nisiwaki
Hi dnsmasq guys. I'm Yuki Nishiwaki. Recently I started to work on dnsmasq stuff. I could ask stupid thing though I want to ask if anyone think the same thing as me. I'm using dnsmasq under cloud controller and dnsmasq have responsibility to lease IP for our all virtual machines connected to