Hi Petr,
> Not tested this specific case, but I think it should be handled correctly,
> unlike previous code. Because it now compares also interface index, it will
> mark existing entry as found only if interface index also match. If it does
> not, new entry is created with correct index
Hi Vladislav
On 7/9/19 10:00 PM, Vladislav Grishenko wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> Regarding 0002-Compare-address-and-interface-index-for-allowed-inte.patch,
> does it support case with different valid interfaces with the same address?
> For example:
> eth0 192.168.1.1/24
> tun0
Hello Alex,
I would try removing all-servers and clear-on-reload statements away. I
would use just one server for testing, retesting all of them for the
same behaviour. When you do not know which server is used, it is hard to
debug better.
I think dots in server=/.X/ are not necessary and maybe
Hi Chiang,
I discovered the same issue and even posted patch on 2019-04-12 [1].
Queries without RD flag are always forwarded to "upstream" server, not
answered locally. REFUSED is usually given by server dnsmasq points to,
dnsmasq is just passing it to you. It should be fixed, but no reply for
it
