Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Single-port mode for TFTP

2019-12-31 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 09:36:58AM +0100, kvaps wrote: > > Of course you can use hostNetwork=true, but it is less secure and not > redundant. You can also use pipework or just correctly configure your firewall rules. Either load the conntrack modules for tftp and nat, or use additional software

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Single-port mode for TFTP

2019-12-31 Thread kvaps
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 8:45 AM Kurt H Maier wrote: > If you need this kind of functionality in Kubernetes you're much better > off using a different CNI plugin to manage your networking. There's no > inherent NAT requirement imposed by Kubernetes itself. This is not about CNI networking,

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Single-port mode for TFTP

2019-12-31 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 12:51:30PM +0100, kvaps wrote: > > Note that Kubernetes uses NAT for external services, so it's not possible > to run TFTP-server for external clients there. There is one proposed > solution for that, it suggests moving away from the RFC and implement > --single-port option