Hi
On 8/25/24 12:07 PM, Danil Smirnov wrote:
> There is some evidence on the Internet that dnsmasq doesn't play well
> with Docker (when run in a Docker container), i.e.:
> https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q4/015909.html
That says:
> This software will then send the H
I've encountered this issue as well, I ended up working around it by
creating bridges that have those vlans as their bridge port. This way
the bridge stays up to dnsmasq even when I take one of these vlans down.
On 8/4/23 09:24, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
Hi,
Observing that dnsmasq (version 2.
On 4/19/23 13:35, 0zl wrote:
On 4/19/23 11:38, Buck Horn wrote:
Yes this is proxy ARP in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_ARP.
HostAPd has an option called proxy_arp which setups up proxy_arp
with additional requirements to meet the Hotspot 2.0 standards. It
comes built in with a
On 4/19/23 11:38, Buck Horn wrote:
Yes this is proxy ARP in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_ARP.
HostAPd has an option called proxy_arp which setups up proxy_arp with
additional requirements to meet the Hotspot 2.0 standards. It comes
built in with a couple of snoopers, including a DHCP
On 4/19/23 08:37, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:16:37AM +0300, 0zl wrote:
On 4/18/23 22:51, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:24:17PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 18/04/2023 16:35, 0zl wrote:
Hello,
This is an issue I've experienced
with ESP8266 and
On 4/19/23 11:38, Buck Horn wrote:
Yes this is proxy ARP in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_ARP.
HostAPd has an option called proxy_arp which setups up proxy_arp with
additional requirements to meet the Hotspot 2.0 standards. It comes
built in with a couple of snoopers, including a DHCP
On 4/18/23 22:51, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:24:17PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 18/04/2023 16:35, 0zl wrote:
Hello,
This is an issue I've experienced
with ESP8266 and proxy ARP on my WiFi network.
Please confirm that it is proxy ARP
as in https://en.wikipedi
uld try to allocate a different
address because MCU has rejected it already.
Not sure what people in this mailing list think, but it feels like
dnsmasq shouldn't be doing this.
All the best,
0zl.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
On 4/12/23 09:09, 0zl wrote:
On 4/12/23 08:19, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 02:03:22AM +0300, 0zl wrote:
On 4/12/23 01:59, 0zl wrote:
Second I don't understand how this works exactly, I intend to create a
script that adds a permanent arp entry to make me more resilie
On 4/12/23 08:19, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 02:03:22AM +0300, 0zl wrote:
On 4/12/23 01:59, 0zl wrote:
Second I don't understand how this works exactly, I intend to create a
script that adds a permanent arp entry to make me more resilient to ARP
spoofing attacks, sho
Hello,
Apologies if this was clear but I'm having trouble understanding the
`--script-arp` entry in the man page. It says:
--script-arp
Enable the "arp" and "arp-old" functions in the
--dhcp-script and --dhcp-luascript.
Firstly when I tried to use I got no arp or arp-ol
Replying to myself because I made a typo in this paragraph. I meant to
say: "should I create the ARP entry on the add/old action and remove on del"
Thank you!
On 4/12/23 01:59, 0zl wrote:
Second I don't understand how this works exactly, I intend to create a
script that adds
On 4/1/23 01:18, Simon Kelley wrote:
The problem is that -domain=mydomain.com,local is being parsed by the
dnsmasq code as being a domain which only applies to hosts which have
an address in the same range as a network interface called "local".
That's not a default domain, hence the problem.
What I intended to do was:
domain=mydomain.com
local=/mydomain.com/
I wanted to have this be done in a single line so I simply did
domain=mydomain,local which I thought was the equivalent of the above.
On 4/1/23 01:18, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 30/03/2023 22:00, 0zl wrote:
Greetings
Greetings,
I believe this might be a bug in dnsmasq. When using the shorthand
`domain=mydomain.com,local` and `dhcp-fqdn`, dnsmasq fails with:
`there must be a default domain when --dhcp-fqdn is set`
I'm not sure if this is intended behavior or not, but from what I could
gather this shouldn'
eople who
found and used the "weird hack" in pre-2.88 releases from suffering a
regression when they upgrade.
For that last reason alone, I propose option 3.
Comments?
Cheers,
Simon.
On 13/03/2023 00:31, 0zl wrote:
Well, it seems like dnsmasq just ignores addresses with /32s. I see
in
sorry for the noise!
On 3/13/23 02:08, 0zl wrote:
Hi everyone,
Previously on Debian Stable, I was using dynamic-host as a weird hack
to get Dnsmasq to serve my PPPOE interface's IP address however this
no longer seems to work with the Dnsmasq supplied in Debian Testing.
It was OK to ju
Hi everyone,
Previously on Debian Stable, I was using dynamic-host as a weird hack to
get Dnsmasq to serve my PPPOE interface's IP address however this no
longer seems to work with the Dnsmasq supplied in Debian Testing.
It was OK to just specify 0.0.0.0 as my ISP would allocate for me a /32
18 matches
Mail list logo
