On Wed, 15 May 2013 21:22:49 +0100, Andy Ruddock wrote:
> Using Debian wheezy.
[...]
> As it stands dnsmasq does pass an address back, and the host works as
> expected, but it's not the address I configured.
That sounds familiar - try upgrading to dnsmasq 2.66 (DHCPv6 in
earlier versions was horri
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:20:46 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> ... and the lesson here, is don't write an unsigned integer to a text
> file and then parse is back in using atoi(). D'oh!
>
>
> 2.66rc5 should fix things, I believe.
Excellent, that seems to work for my test-case now. Thanks a lot for
the
On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:18:15 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> Hope that helps...
>
> It helps a lot, but there must be other stuff going on here that we
> don't have logs for. The crucial thing to look for is the IAID: that's
> logged in the ia-na options which dnsmasq is sending, and it appears as
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:42:25 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 08/04/13 19:17, Christof Meerwald wrote:
>> I am afraid I spoke too soon - behaviour seems to be a bit random.
>>
>> So, my dnsmasq configuration is available at
>> http://svn.cmeerw.net/cfg/fruity.
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 14:49:36 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 07/04/13 21:28, Christof Meerwald wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:02:13 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
>>> http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/release-candidates/dnsmasq-2.66rc1.tar.gz
>>>
>>> For IP
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:02:13 +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/release-candidates/dnsmasq-2.66rc1.tar.gz
>
> For IPv4 users, there are not many changes, but IPv6, and specifically
> DHCPv6, has seen much development. I'd like as many people as possible
> to check o
