so my question finally is: is it possible to get a similar behaviour of
dnsmasq without switching to fixed addresses?
actually i use arpwatch to detect new clients on my network and since the ip
addresses from the clients permanently change this is not possible anymore.
thanks for reply in advance,
ga
tement for mac-ip-hostname mapping.
But I want to have the DNS entries permanently preserved resp. dns
mappings without prior dhcp ip negotiation. Actually this means I don't
want DNS to be dynamic.
Is this somehow configurable?
Thanks a lot in a
On 07/29/2012 06:39 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 26/07/12 13:31, gabriel wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I've just subscribed to this list and have a question to a previous
>> post. But I don't know how to reply on that thread now.
>>
>> The thread
> My question is whether it would be possible to have a single
> line config statement for mac-ip-hostname mapping.
> But I want to have the DNS entries permanently preserved resp.
> dns mappings without prior dhcp ip negotiation. Actually this
> means I don't want DNS to be dy
Hi,
I currently use dibbler with radvd to advertise a v6 prefix received
via prefix delegation. I also use dnsmasq for DNS and DHCPv4. My
understanding is that I can replace radvd with dnsmasq. I noticed that
recent versions allow advertising of prefixes received via PD (using
the constructor para
nd enabled a
script to run the machines still get their old addresses.
maybe I just don't check how to do this ...
thanks in advance,
gabriel
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/m
I haven't tried it, but maybe 127.0.0.2 will do the trick.
On Feb 11, 2014 4:40 PM, "Chris Green" wrote:
> I have a few entries in my dnsmasq.conf file to block some tracking
> sites, as follows:-
>
> address=/www.addthis.com/127.0.0.1
> address=/googlesyndication.com/127.0.0.1
> addr
First off, I would like to say, dnsmasq, is an excellent piece of
software! Exceptionally fast, and right now, is serving close to 1000
clients over four subnets, who surf the internet as if their lives
depend on it.
I have only one problem. I have a postfix server, which is using
dnsmasq as it's
I have a laptop that I use in many different sites, and it's annoying
when someone doesn't have DNS setup properly. I wish to set up my laptop
as it's own DNS server. What would be the best way to do this, and what
do you guys recommend?
I too have noticed this strange phenomena, and not just in DNSMasq. On
almost every DHCP server I have ever used, when I look at the lease
file, there is never hardware info for linux boxes. Personally, and my
understanding of the underlying mechanics of DHCP is very limited, I
thought that all req
Hi,
I'm new around here, so I'm not sure if this message belongs to this list.
I made a patch for dnsmasq, allowing dynamic query the ether
information using getent calls.
My goal is use dnsmasq in a large cluster deployment (exactly the
original goal of this code), providing DHCP using LDAP as
Hi,
> While your method should work, it definitely won't be efficient. Since DHCP
> is a
> polling protocol, requests have to be more frequent than updates
> almost by definition
I'm using a LDAP backend to keep all information in one place. We have
a small team to deal with many hosts, includ
Hi again,
> An addition of DBus methods which allow dhcp-host-like configuration
> to be supplied would seem to be a winner for this, IMHO.
If I understand correctly, this still require that the full "database"
has to be updated to dnsmasq before the lease.
My goal is a mechanism that query a
>
> It needs some clean-up, but something like this has some attractions. The
> main drawback I can see is that the get_() library calls can all block for
> arbitrary lengths of time, which leaves the network with no DNS and no DHCP
> and no TFTP. Worse: gethostbyname() and gethostbyaddr() can poss
quot; limit is..
Regards
Gabriel Dungan
gjdu...@dstaftn.net
On 07/04/2013 06:46 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 04/07/13 12:44, gabriel wrote:
>>
>>
>> hello,
>>
>> is it somehow possible (signal, etc) to flush dnsmasq's internal dhcp
>> lease cache?
>>
>> i want to be able to update ip addresses without
as though it may be an
issue with dnsmasq itself, rather than
my config. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101498 contains my config
file, as well as some netstat checks
we've exhasuted our options, does anyone know what the problem is? Thanks for
your time!
--
Gabriel Deve
then can you see incoming dhcp requests with
tcpdump while NOT see respective outgoing dhcp replies? If so, are there
any messages from dnsmasq in your log files?
What options should I be putting through tcpdump in order to obtain what
you're looking for?
--
Gabriel Devenyi
a...@staticwave.ca
, as I've
not restricted the lan interface in any way
(at least as far as I understand) attached is my firehol configuration, anyone
see where I'm going wrong?
--
Gabriel Devenyi
a...@staticwave.ca
#FIREHOL_LOG_LEVEL=7
lan_ips="192.168.1.1/24"
dnat to 192.168.1.2 proto t
f. You need to be able to recieve packets sent to
> 255.255.255.255 and packets sent from 0.0.0.0, as well as the more
> obvious things.
Alright, I understand now, I've changed what eth0 is allowed to accept:
interface eth0 lan src "${lan_ips} 0.0.0.0" and dnsmasq works now, cheers!
--
Gabriel Devenyi
a...@staticwave.ca
20 matches
Mail list logo
