Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] TTL in nested wild card CNAME

2020-03-17 Thread Sasha Litvak
they are not cached. That is why I added ttl-min 5s. On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 10:46 AM Simon Kelley wrote: > On 17/03/2020 01:31, Sasha Litvak wrote: > > I couldn't find a specific answer anywhere so hopefully someone has a > > clue on this list > > > > We are using dnsmasq on o

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] TTL in nested wild card CNAME

2020-03-17 Thread Sasha Litvak
Geert, What is the meaning of this? On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 1:48 AM Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 08:31:17PM -0500, Sasha Litvak wrote: > > I couldn't find a specific answer anywhere so hopefully someone has a > > clue on this list > > > > We are u

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] TTL in nested wild card CNAME

2020-03-17 Thread Sasha Litvak
Geert, Just in case, .consul is not a registered domain name. It is assigned with Hashicorp consul service discovery product and is internal to us. Whence forwarders. On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 9:08 AM Sasha Litvak wrote: > Geert, > > What is the meaning of this? > > On Tue, Mar 17

[Dnsmasq-discuss] TTL in nested wild card CNAME

2020-03-16 Thread Sasha Litvak
I couldn't find a specific answer anywhere so hopefully someone has a clue on this list We are using dnsmasq on our servers as a caching dns solution. Most of our domains are resolved by a wildcard record like this $TTL 3600 ; 1 hour A 10.10.10.23 $ORIGIN