Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Any way to force dnsmasq to reply on interface secondary IP ? (Linux)

2016-02-06 Thread Jarek Polok
> On 05/02/16 22:55, Simon Kelley wrote: > [...] Sorry for the noise: that turned out to be a non-issue actually .. after some more testing I discovered that I see the problem only on some subnets ... so the problem is not dnsmasq related .. Thanks ! Jarek __

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Any way to force dnsmasq to reply on interface secondary IP ? (Linux)

2016-02-05 Thread Simon Kelley
On 05/02/16 10:36, Jarek Polok wrote: > Hello everybody ! > > I'm trying to set up the pxe server / proxy dhcp, > using dnsmasq 2.66 and setting options: > > [...] > #system interface setup > #eth2: > #[...] > #inet X.X.X.158/YY brd X.X.X.159 scope global eth2 > #inet X.X.X.150/YY scope global

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Any way to force dnsmasq to reply on interface secondary IP ? (Linux)

2016-02-05 Thread Jaroslaw Polok
Hello On 05/02/16 22:55, Simon Kelley wrote: [...] Dnsmasq doesn't pay much attention to setting the source address in DHCP replies, since for bog-standard DHCP, it's totally ignored. The information about where the reply is coming from is carried in fields in the DHCP packet. Are you sure

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Any way to force dnsmasq to reply on interface secondary IP ? (Linux)

2016-02-05 Thread Jarek Polok
Hello everybody ! I'm trying to set up the pxe server / proxy dhcp, using dnsmasq 2.66 and setting options: [...] #system interface setup #eth2: #[...] #inet X.X.X.158/YY brd X.X.X.159 scope global eth2 #inet X.X.X.150/YY scope global secondary eth2 listen-address=X.X.X.150 # this is a