On 07/11/2018 11:55, Petr Mensik wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I am sure this is already an old issue. I forgot to mark patch presence
> in subject. I proposed a way to fallback to kernel assigned outgoing
> ports. Is it unacceptable? Have you even noticed the patches? Could you
> check if they could be
Hi Simon,
I am sure this is already an old issue. I forgot to mark patch presence
in subject. I proposed a way to fallback to kernel assigned outgoing
ports. Is it unacceptable? Have you even noticed the patches? Could you
check if they could be used?
I think any new deployments of dnsmasq would
On 10/08/18 13:37, Petr Menšík wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we discovered our dnsmasq were using also privileged source ports when
> sending queries. Interesting enough, it has right to do it, because it
> has to listen also on privileged port. It never drops such privilege.
>
> It was fixed in commit
Hello,
we discovered our dnsmasq were using also privileged source ports when
sending queries. Interesting enough, it has right to do it, because it
has to listen also on privileged port. It never drops such privilege.
It was fixed in commit [1]. But my question is, why is there even custom
