Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Is there any use case for "--dhcp-range=0.0.0.0, static, 0.0.0.0" to support all subnet

2018-03-15 Thread Simon Kelley
There's something very similar to this already in place for DHCPv6, where it's allowed to specify --dhcp-range=::,static To allow any defined static allocation. For consistency, it may make sense to simply use 0.0.0.0 so --dhcp-range=0.0.0.0,static represents the special case. Netmask handling

[Dnsmasq-discuss] Is there any use case for "--dhcp-range=0.0.0.0, static, 0.0.0.0" to support all subnet

2018-03-12 Thread Yuki Nisiwaki
Hi dnsmasq guys. I'm Yuki Nishiwaki. Recently I started to work on dnsmasq stuff. I could ask stupid thing though I want to ask if anyone think the same thing as me. I'm using dnsmasq under cloud controller and dnsmasq have responsibility to lease IP for our all virtual machines connected to