Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RA-acquired address not marked as 'dynamic' with 2.82

2021-06-21 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:48 PM Simon Kelley wrote: > > On 02/06/2021 09:18, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 4:28 PM Christian Ehrhardt > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:57 AM Christian Ehrhardt > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> since nothing happened on this

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RA-acquired address not marked as 'dynamic' with 2.82

2021-06-15 Thread Simon Kelley
On 02/06/2021 09:18, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 4:28 PM Christian Ehrhardt > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:57 AM Christian Ehrhardt >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> since nothing happened on this topic (e.g. committed to git / further >>> discussion) I wondered if you

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RA-acquired address not marked as 'dynamic' with 2.82

2021-06-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 4:28 PM Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:57 AM Christian Ehrhardt > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > since nothing happened on this topic (e.g. committed to git / further > > discussion) I wondered if you waited for a confirmation. > > > > The first patch by

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RA-acquired address not marked as 'dynamic' with 2.82

2021-01-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:57 AM Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > > Hi, > since nothing happened on this topic (e.g. committed to git / further > discussion) I wondered if you waited for a confirmation. > > The first patch by Iain was ignored or not seen, I'd expect both might work. > Nevertheless in

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RA-acquired address not marked as 'dynamic' with 2.82

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi, since nothing happened on this topic (e.g. committed to git / further discussion) I wondered if you waited for a confirmation. The first patch by Iain was ignored or not seen, I'd expect both might work. Nevertheless in case there was any (hidden) reason I picked the second patch suggested

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RA-acquired address not marked as 'dynamic' with 2.82

2020-09-07 Thread Dominik
On 04.09.20 11:46, Iain Lane wrote: > Hi, > > In Ubuntu we started seeing failures of NetworkManager's tests when we > updated to dnsmasq 2.82 (from the Debian package; thanks Simon for > maintaining this). Search for 'Regex didn't match' in: > > >

[Dnsmasq-discuss] RA-acquired address not marked as 'dynamic' with 2.82

2020-09-04 Thread Iain Lane
Hi, In Ubuntu we started seeing failures of NetworkManager's tests when we updated to dnsmasq 2.82 (from the Debian package; thanks Simon for maintaining this). Search for 'Regex didn't match' in: