On 24 December 2016 at 16:15, Alec Robertson wrote:
> My apologies for the unclear explanation.
>
> For background I am using OpenWRT/LEDE r2544-a032940, on a TP-LINK Archer
> C7.
Have you disabled option leasefile'/tmp/dhcp.leases'? Any time a
client comes back it really should get the same
.
Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko
From: Dnsmasq-discuss [mailto:dnsmasq-discuss-boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk]
On Behalf Of Alec Robertson
Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2016 4:14 AM
To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Sequential IP doesn't look for u
Thank you for your reply. It was just really to make it like every other
router I’ve used. It’s not a “problem” as such.
—
Alec Robertson
On 25 December 2016 at 11:03:35, Albert ARIBAUD (albert.arib...@free.fr)
wrote:
(TL;DR: skip to last paragraph of my reply)
Hi Alec,
Le Sat, 24 Dec 2016 18:
(TL;DR: skip to last paragraph of my reply)
Hi Alec,
Le Sat, 24 Dec 2016 18:13:46 -0500
Alec Robertson a écrit:
> I understand what you’re saying but I was suggesting this should be a
> feature enhancement. All the other routers I have used work the way I
> have described, be it NETGEAR, Asus,
Bonjour,
Le Sat, 24 Dec 2016 16:15:23 -0500
Alec Robertson a écrit:
> My apologies for the unclear explanation.
>
> For background I am using OpenWRT/LEDE r2544-a032940, on a TP-LINK
> Archer C7.
>
> For a test, if you set the leasetime to be very short, say 2 minutes
> and connect multiple de
I understand what you’re saying but I was suggesting this should be a
feature enhancement. All the other routers I have used work the way I have
described, be it NETGEAR, Asus, Huawei, etc.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys
My apologies for the unclear explanation.
For background I am using OpenWRT/LEDE r2544-a032940, on a TP-LINK Archer
C7.
For a test, if you set the leasetime to be very short, say 2 minutes and
connect multiple devices, they will at first be given IPs in sequential
order starting from the lowest a
Hi again Alec,
Le Sat, 24 Dec 2016 06:55:09 -0800
Alec Robertson a écrit:
> Thank you for your replies.
>
> What I mean (as I said I didn’t explain it very well), is that the
> sequential IP feature results in lots of empty IP addresses, so
> effectively you end up with a much smaller range of
Thank you for your replies.
What I mean (as I said I didn’t explain it very well), is that the
sequential IP feature results in lots of empty IP addresses, so effectively
you end up with a much smaller range of possible IP addresses.
I was requesting the ability for dnsmasq to look through the en
On 12/23/2016 08:04 PM, Alec Robertson wrote:
When using sequential IP, the IP allocation should start from the lowest
available IP address.
this depends on the implementation... some start at the bottom (lowest) and
others start at the top (highest)... where they start does not really matter.
Hi Alec,
Le Fri, 23 Dec 2016 20:04:55 -0500
Alec Robertson a écrit:
> When using sequential IP, the IP allocation should start from the
> lowest available IP address.
>
> However, if the lease time is quite short for the clients, the
> clients can renew their IP addresses and be given IP addres
When using sequential IP, the IP allocation should start from the lowest
available IP address.
However, if the lease time is quite short for the clients, the clients can
renew their IP addresses and be given IP addresses that don’t use the
entire range available, meaning that you could have a rang
12 matches
Mail list logo