What would you use for a default gateway for these clients? DHCP has
to issue them a default gateway in their own block, otherwise they
can't communicate with the DHCP server to accept the address, and
normally the address of the dnsmasq server is used for this.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:41 PM,
, June 25, 2010 11:13pm
To: kfried...@syncadence.com
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Serving address range on a different subnet than
the interface
What would you use for a default gateway for these clients? DHCP has
to issue them a default gateway
kfried...@syncadence.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to emulate a behavior found on dhcpd running on linux 2.6.28
I have an interface eth0 with IP 192.168.13.100/24.
I want to serve out one or more IPs on a different subnet, say a range
of 66.10.20.100 to 66.10.20.200 from eth0
I want to avoid
kfried...@syncadence.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to emulate a behavior found on dhcpd running on linux 2.6.28
Is this using dhcpd's shared network configuration option. I have
considered adding something similar to dnsmasq, even though it's
horribly confusing.
Simon.
-Original Message-
From: richardvo...@gmail.com richardvo...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 11:13pm
To: kfried...@syncadence.com
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Serving address range on a different subnet
than the interface
What
