Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] TTL in nested wild card CNAME

2020-03-18 Thread Simon Kelley
On 18/03/2020 00:30, Sasha Litvak wrote: > Simon, > > Hosts in domain .consul are resolved by DNS servers forwarding requests > to a consul clusters.  I also have hard coded direct consul server > records for .consul in dnsmasq config.  Nothing in /etc/hosts . Consul > returns records with  TTL

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] TTL in nested wild card CNAME

2020-03-17 Thread Sasha Litvak
Simon, Hosts in domain .consul are resolved by DNS servers forwarding requests to a consul clusters. I also have hard coded direct consul server records for .consul in dnsmasq config. Nothing in /etc/hosts . Consul returns records with TTL 0 . I perhaps wrongly thought it meant they are not

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] TTL in nested wild card CNAME

2020-03-17 Thread Simon Kelley
On 17/03/2020 01:31, Sasha Litvak wrote: > I couldn't find a specific answer anywhere so hopefully someone has a > clue on this list > > We are using dnsmasq on our servers as a caching dns solution. > > Most of our domains are resolved by a wildcard record like this > > $TTL 3600 ; 1

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] TTL in nested wild card CNAME

2020-03-17 Thread Sasha Litvak
Geert, What is the meaning of this? On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 1:48 AM Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 08:31:17PM -0500, Sasha Litvak wrote: > > I couldn't find a specific answer anywhere so hopefully someone has a > > clue on this list > > > > We are using dnsmasq on our servers as

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] TTL in nested wild card CNAME

2020-03-17 Thread Sasha Litvak
Geert, Just in case, .consul is not a registered domain name. It is assigned with Hashicorp consul service discovery product and is internal to us. Whence forwarders. On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 9:08 AM Sasha Litvak wrote: > Geert, > > What is the meaning of this? > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 1:48 AM

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] TTL in nested wild card CNAME

2020-03-17 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 08:31:17PM -0500, Sasha Litvak wrote: > I couldn't find a specific answer anywhere so hopefully someone has a > clue on this list > > We are using dnsmasq on our servers as a caching dns solution. > > Most of our domains are resolved by a wildcard record like this > >

[Dnsmasq-discuss] TTL in nested wild card CNAME

2020-03-16 Thread Sasha Litvak
I couldn't find a specific answer anywhere so hopefully someone has a clue on this list We are using dnsmasq on our servers as a caching dns solution. Most of our domains are resolved by a wildcard record like this $TTL 3600 ; 1 hour A 10.10.10.23 $ORIGIN