任晓磊 wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> No. --no-daemon OR --log-queries is sufficient. That was true with the
>> code in 2.55 too, but the use of bitwise operators makes it less
>> obvious. I suspect the part of your patch which made it work for you was
>> the changin
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> No. --no-daemon OR --log-queries is sufficient. That was true with the
> code in 2.55 too, but the use of bitwise operators makes it less
> obvious. I suspect the part of your patch which made it work for you was
> the changing of the log faci
任晓磊 wrote:
> I see
> if (option_bool(OPT_DEBUG) || option_bool(OPT_LOG))
> in the 2.65test15 source. Must I use --no-daemon and --log-queries both?
No. --no-daemon OR --log-queries is sufficient. That was true with the
code in 2.55 too, but the use of bitwise operators makes it less
obvious. I
I see
if (option_bool(OPT_DEBUG) || option_bool(OPT_LOG))
in the 2.65test15 source. Must I use --no-daemon and --log-queries both?
But manpages didn't said that.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> I think this is fixed in
>
> http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/test-release
任晓磊 wrote:
> I use
> dnsmasq --log-queries
>
> After I kill USR1 signal to its pid, it did NOT dump cache content as
> manpage said, only statistics in syslog.
> File attached with mail is my patch to fix this.
>
> According to original source, we should use
> dnsmasq --no-daemon --log-queries
>
I use
dnsmasq --log-queries
After I kill USR1 signal to its pid, it did NOT dump cache content as
manpage said, only statistics in syslog.
File attached with mail is my patch to fix this.
According to original source, we should use
dnsmasq --no-daemon --log-queries
before fix it.
--
Ren Xiaolei
d
